Strategy | Full reprogramming via iPS cells | Partial reprogramming via cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) | Direct cardiac reprogramming |
---|---|---|---|
Cell state | iPS cells (pluripotent) | Cardiac progenitor cells (multipotent) | Differentiated cardiomyocytes (unipotent) |
Properties | 1. Pluripotent cells 2. Bypass ethical and legal problems (compared to ES cells) 3. Not accompanied by the problem of immunologic refusal | Multipotent CPCs can generate vascular and cardiac cells | Transdifferentiation without an undifferentiated (intermediate) state (i.e., iPS cells, CPCs) |
Advantages | Engraftment of ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes is possible in large animal models, accompanied by improved heart function | A short culture period (weeks) required to produce cardiomyocytes, compared with iPSC-mediated cardiomyocytes | 1. In vivo reprogramming 2. Takes 4Â weeks to generate functional cardiomyocytes 3. Lack of tumor formation 4. Generating only cardiomyocytes |
Disadvantages | 1. Risk of teratoma formation 2. A long culture period (months) is required to generate cardiomyocytes 3. Immaturity of stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes | 1. Uncertain mechanism of OSKM-mediated CPC induction 2. Risk of tumor formation | 1. Immaturity of iCMs 2. Low efficiency of full reprogramming into functional cardiomyocytes 3. iCMs are not proliferative |