Skip to main content

Table 3 Evaluation methods

From: Cartilage evaluation by ultrasonography in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a scoping review

Author

Evaluation methods

Measurement methods

Scoring methods

Measurement (quantitative)

Binary

Semi-quantitative

Include the chondrosynovial interface

Sound velocity correction

  

Aisen et al. [12]

Yes

Yes

Grades 0–6

Original

Iagnocco et al. [28]

Yes

Yes

Surface irregularity

Grassi et al. [18]

Yes (MCP 3 in healthy)

Yes

Loss of definition

Østergaard et al. [19]

Yes

Yes

Lund et al. [20]

Yes

Grades 0–3

Original

Batalov et al. [13]

Yes

Yes

Grades 0–6

Original

Möller et al. [29]

Yes

Darweesh et al. [21]

Yes

Sanja et al. [22]

Yes

Cartilage reduction

Filippucci et al. [30]

Yes

Grades 0–4

[38]

Riente et al. [14]

Yes

Cartilage changes

Yücesoy et al. [23]

Yes

Yes

Irregularity, loss of clarity

Original

Di Geso et al. [15]

Yes

Presence or absence

Pereira et al. [24]

Yes

Scores 0–4

[38]

Bisi et al. [25]

Yes

Grades 0–4

[38]

Mandl et al. [3]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Onodera et al. [31]

Yes

Grades 1–6

[39]

Luz et al. [11]

Yes

Yes

Grades 0–4/presence or absence

[38]

Mesci et al. [32]

Yes

No

Sakthiswary et al. [33]

Yes

No

Sarzi-Puttini et al. [10]

Yes

Grades 0–4

[38]

Hurnakova et al. [16]

Yes

Grades 0–4

[38]

Yang et al. [26]

Yes

Presence or absence

Mandl et al. [17]

Yes

Grades 0–2

[17]

Abda et al. [27]

Yes

Yes

Grades 0–3/presence or absence

Ogura et al. [34]

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Grades 0–2

[17]

Cipolletta et al. [35]

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Grades 0–4

[38]

Cipolletta et al. [36]

Yes

Yes (quantitative score)

Yes

Yes

No

Grades 0–2

[17]

Yildirim et al. [37]

Yes

No

No

  1. —, data not available