Open Access

Organ dysfunction as a new standard for defining sepsis

Inflammation and Regeneration201636:24

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232-016-0029-y

Received: 12 August 2016

Accepted: 1 November 2016

Published: 15 November 2016

Abstract

Despite advances in intensive care and the widespread use of standardized care included in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, sepsis remains a leading cause of death, and the prevalence of sepsis increases concurrent with the aging process. The diagnosis of sepsis was originally based on the evidence of persistent bacteremia (septicemia) but was modified in 1992 to incorporate systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Since then, SIRS has become the gold standard for the diagnosis of sepsis. In 2016, the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine published a new clinical definition of sepsis that is called Sepsis-3. In contrast to previous definitions, Sepsis-3 is based on organ dysfunctions and uses a sequential organ failure (SOFA) score as an index. Thus, patients diagnosed with respect to Sepsis-3 will inevitably represent a different population than those previously diagnosed. We assume that this drastic change in clinical definition will affect not only clinical practice but also the viewpoint and focus of basic research. This review intends to summarize the pathophysiology of sepsis and organ dysfunction and discusses potential directions for future research.

Keywords

Sepsis-3 Sequential organ failure assessment score Acute respiratory distress syndrome Acute kidney injury Disseminated intravascular coagulation

Background

There have been significant advances in intensive care and the widespread use of standardized care in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. However, sepsis remains a leading cause of death and its prevalence increases concurrent with the aging process. In 2016, the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine published a new clinical definition of sepsis that is termed as Sepsis-3. This new definition was subsequently endorsed by a range of affiliated societies, including the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM). The consensus of opinion indicates that Sepsis-3 will lead to significant changes in the concept of sepsis [1].

The diagnosis of sepsis was historically based on the evidence of persistent bacteremia (septicemia). However, in accordance with the progress in our understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis, the definition was greatly modified in 1992 to exclude bacteremia and to incorporate parameters related to systemic inflammation (Sepsis-1), namely the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) [2] (Fig. 1). At the same time, two severe subgroups of sepsis were defined as severe sepsis and septic shock. Although the definition of sepsis was reevaluated and modified to include a wider range of parameters in 2003 (Sepsis-2), SIRS continues to be widely used for diagnosing sepsis in various clinical settings [3]. However, the inadequate specificity and sensitivity of the SIRS criteria were recognized as a significant limitation and, thus, were omitted from Sepsis-3 [4]. In contrast to previous definitions, Sepsis-3 is based on organ dysfunctions and sepsis is diagnosed when there is an increase of more than 2 points in the total sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score; thus, patients diagnosed with respect to Sepsis-3 will inevitably represent a different population from those diagnosed with respect to Sepsis-1 or Sepsis-2. Therefore, we assumed that this drastic change in clinical definition will not only affect clinical practice, especially the evaluation of patients with suspected infection, but also lead to changes in the focus of basic research. In this review, we intend to provide an overview of the pathophysiology of sepsis-induced organ dysfunction and elucidate the present unresolved questions for indicating the direction of the research in this field.
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram showing the previous and new definitions of sepsis. Asterisk indicates a small fraction of infected patients develop organ dysfunction without fulfilling the established SIRS criteria. SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome

Pathophysiology of sepsis

Infection is initiated by the local invasion of microorganisms into a living body. When the host’s immune system is healthy and the quantity and virulence of the microorganisms involved are below a tolerance limit, infection is restricted and spontaneously cures. However, if microorganisms overcome a host’s immunological self-defense system, they can locally extend or spread to distant tissues and organs via the blood stream. In response to the systemic invasion of microorganisms, the body triggers the production of inflammatory mediators and characteristic signs and symptoms, such as fever or hypothermia, tachycardia, tachypnea, and an increase or decrease in peripheral white blood cell counts develop, all of which are essential components of the SIRS criteria. It was at this stage that the diagnosis of sepsis was made with respect to the former definition, which often predisposed the failure of vital organs, currently referred to as multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Thus, sepsis diagnosed with respect to the Sepsis-3 definition, namely infection-induced single or multiple organ dysfunctions, is more advanced and manifests with more severe conditions than that diagnosed by previous definitions.

Pathogen-derived substances with immunological properties, notably lipopolysaccharide (LPS), are referred to as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and have been shown to induce sepsis-like conditions in vivo and activate immune cells in vitro [5]. Injured tissues also release a set of molecules with similar properties, including high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB-1) and histones, collectively referred to as damage (danger)-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) [6]. Under septic conditions, PAMPs and DAMPs bind to specific cell-surface or cytosolic proteins that are called pattern recognition receptors, which are located on monocytes/macrophages, vascular endothelial cells, and other stromal cells, and that trigger the activation of intracellular signaling cascades [7]. Activated cells release various humoral mediators, particularly cytokines, which accelerate local and systemic inflammations.

Cytokines are classified as pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory, and the time course of their expressions vary. Pro-inflammatory cytokines play major roles in inducing systemic inflammation and in the development of MODS. Among the pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and interleukin 1beta (IL-1β) are detected in the blood of patients with sepsis and are known to induce septic shock-like conditions when administered to animals in vivo, thus suggesting their key pathogenic roles in sepsis [8, 9]. In contrast, anti-inflammatory cytokines contribute to the regulation and resolution of acute inflammation, while also contributing to the immunosuppression and hypersensitivity to infection that is observed during the later phase of sepsis.

Sepsis-associated lung dysfunction: ARDS

Lung dysfunction, referred to as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or acute lung injury (ALI), is frequently associated with sepsis. In our recent epidemiological analysis, ALI was complicated in 40.2 % of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and had a significantly poor outcome [10]. A previous report revealed that sepsis-related ARDS was associated with a poorer outcome than non-sepsis-related ARDS [11]. An increase in microvascular permeability, resulting from the dysregulation of cell-to-cell interaction or tissue destruction, is the fundamental pathophysiology underlying ARDS. Extensive investigation has revealed the prominent contribution of neutrophils, which are major terminal effector cells in innate immunity, to tissue injury in ARDS [12, 13]. Neutrophils have also been shown to play a role in the dysfunction of other organs. Neutrophils release granular enzymes, reactive oxygen metabolites, bioactive lipids, and cytokines [14] and can induce the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps [15], most of which can either directly or indirectly injure tissues, leading to an increase in microvascular permeability and resulting in pulmonary edema. Interleukin 8 (also called CXCL8), a potent neutrophil chemotactic chemokine, also plays important roles in the pathophysiology of ARDS, along with TNFα and IL-1β, which represent major players in septic shock [16]. In addition, some DAMPs have been recently recognized as mediators or cytokines with respect to their regulated production and immune-regulating functions. A pathogenic role of HMGB-1, a molecule originally identified as a nuclear binding protein, was initially reported in sepsis [17] and later in sepsis-associated ARDS [18]. Mitochondrial DAMPs can stimulate PMNs and induce a sepsis-like state and ALI [19]. Along with neutrophil-mediated tissue injury, apoptosis and autophagy are also involved in sepsis-induced tissue injuries that are associated with ARDS [20, 21]. However, these findings did not lead to the development of appropriate clinical therapeutics.

Dysfunction of other organs in sepsis

As mentioned in the above section, sepsis is often complicated with organ dysfunctions other than ARDS. Table 1 summarizes the pathophysiology, clinical features, SOFA score indices, and available treatments for individual organ dysfunctions. The type of failure or dysfunction observed in each organ is relatively stereotyped and most are associated with poor outcomes [22, 23]. Sepsis-derived systemic shock and resultant tissue hypoperfusion commonly contribute to the development of most organ dysfunctions, which is supported by the findings that early goal-directed therapy (EGDT), a protocol-based therapeutic intervention involving fluid resuscitation, improved the MODS score and outcome [24]. Furthermore, plasma pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were significantly reduced in an EGDT group compared with a control group, suggesting that global tissue ischemia is an important contributor to the early inflammatory response in sepsis [25]. However, as the mere recovery of systemic circulation by fluid resuscitation and inotropic agents is insufficient to completely restore organ function, other injurious mechanisms are most certainly involved.
Table 1

Organ dysfunction in sepsis

Target organ

Pathophysiology

Clinical features

SOFA score indices (other beneficial indices)

Available treatments

Lung (ARDS)

Vascular hyper-permeability, neutrophil accumulation

Impaired oxygenation

PaO2/FIO2 <400 (bilateral infiltration on CXR)

Mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume and PEEP

Liver

Disturbed intracellular and extracellular bile salt transport

Jaundice, cholestasis

Serum bilirubin ≥1.2 mg/dl

Not established

Kidney (AKI)

Tubular epithelial cell injury, dysfunction or adaptive response of tubular epithelial cells

Reduced GFR, reduced urine volume

Serum creatinine ≥1.2 Urine output <500 ml/day

Hemodialysis

Cardiovascular system

Myocardial depression, impaired intracellular calcium homeostasis, disrupted high energy phosphate production.

Ventricular dilatation, reduced ejection fraction, reduced contractility

Mean arterial pressure <70 mmHg

Inotropic agents, beta-blocker

Gastrointestinal tract

Epithelial hyper-permeability, altered microbiome

Mucosal bleeding, paralytic ileus

Not included

Proton pump inhibitor, early enteral nutrition, probiotics, SDD

Central nervous system (SAE)

Direct cellular damage, mitochondrial and endothelial dysfunction, neurotransmission disturbances, calcium dyshomeostasis

Altered mental status

GCS <15

Light sedation, early rehabilitation

Blood coagulation system (DIC)

Intravascular coagulation, microvascular damage, systemic thrombin generation, endothelial injury

Bleeding diathesis, microthrombi and tissue ischemia

Platelets <150 × 103/μl (prolonged prothrombin time, increased FDP)

Antithrombin, recombinant thrombomodulin, concentrated platelet preparation

SOFA sequential organ failure assessment, ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, CXR chest X-ray, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, AKI acute kidney injury, GFR glomerular filtration ratio, SDD selective digestive decontamination, SAE sepsis-associated encephalopathy, GCS Glasgow coma scale, DIC disseminated intravascular coagulation, FDP fibrin degradation product

During infection, the liver plays critical roles in modulating host defense and regulating inflammation, mostly via the clearance of pathogens and PAMPs, and in producing acute phase proteins such as C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A [26, 27]. A previous study revealed through a multivariate analysis that liver cirrhosis was associated with a 2.4-fold increase in sepsis mortality [28]. Our analysis and that of other groups showed that 10–17 % of patients with severe sepsis were complicated with hepatic dysfunction [22, 23], which was shown to be associated with a poorer clinical outcome in a large observational study [23]. Sepsis-associated hepatic dysfunction is clinically recognized by jaundice or cholestasis and is caused by various underlying mechanisms such as the impairment of energy-dependent bile and bile acid transport by hypoxia, hypoperfusion, and overproduced cytokines. No treatments are currently established for such conditions.

The kidneys are the main controllers of water and electrolyte metabolism under normal physiological conditions, and the roles of the kidneys become even more important during sepsis for maintaining vital organ circulation and cellular electrolyte balance and for protecting the lungs from life-threatening pulmonary edema. Acute dysfunction of the kidneys is referred to as acute kidney injury (AKI) and was observed in 37–40 % of cases with severe sepsis [22, 23]. AKI is clinically detected as an increase in serum creatinine level or a decrease in urine volume and is associated with poorer clinical outcomes [22, 23, 28]. Renal tubular epithelial cell injury, which is because of disturbed microcirculation and hypoxia, as well as the dysfunction or adaptive response of tubular epithelial cells, including the downregulation of metabolism and cell cycle arrest, is induced by excessive inflammation and represents a key feature of AKI [29]. Although hemodialysis has been established as a clinical therapy for AKI, no strategy to prevent AKI or to help patients recover from AKI has been developed.

Blood coagulation and fibrinolysis systems contribute in the maintenance of systemic and organ circulation against various injuries to the living body. Under the condition of sepsis, these systems tend to dysfunction, a condition referred to as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which induces organ dysfunction and is closely associated with higher mortality. The major pathophysiology of DIC includes the generalized activation of intravascular coagulation, microvascular damage, systemic thrombin generation, and endothelial injury [30]. There are several diagnostic criteria for DIC, such as those by JAAM, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), and the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, with increasingly reduced levels of sensitivity in this order. The SOFA score used in the new Sepsis-3 definition includes platelet counts as a parameter for DIC. In retrospective and prospective studies, DIC was observed in 18–41 % by ISTH and 47 % by the JAAM criteria [3133]. Although several potentially effective drugs have been clinically used, such as antithrombin III and recombinant thrombomodulin, their efficacy in terms of survival and protection against MODS remains to be clarified.

In addition to the abovementioned organs, it is known that the functions of the cardiovascular system, gastrointestinal tract, and central nervous system are often impaired during sepsis and are crucial for patient outcome. Although some therapies, including beta-blockers for the cardiovascular system, early enteral nutrition for the gastrointestinal tract, and light sedation/early rehabilitation for the central nervous system, are potentially effective, their efficacy is limited. Consequently, new organ-specific strategies based on a novel insight into the pathophysiology should be explored.

Future directions for sepsis research

Previous research in both animal models and patients revealed that sepsis is inevitably associated with excessive inflammation. However, anti-inflammatory strategies have failed to demonstrate clear benefit in terms of patient outcome. To begin a new era of clinical practice for sepsis, it is important to consider the appropriate direction for future research. The introduction of new clinical definition may provide us a favorable opportunity to change our emphasis with regard to research. Although the true causal relationship between individual organ dysfunction and clinical outcome remains unresolved, the extent of organ dysfunction and the total number of dysfunctional organs involved are both associated with increased mortality, rendering attempts to protect or recover from organ dysfunction as a promising approach for sepsis research. Although the lungs will continue to be the main target, all vital organs could be possible targets for research.

In most preclinical experiments on sepsis, LPS or pathogens were administered to small animals, and the post-mortem characteristics of single organs and survival rates were evaluated. However, the function of multiple organs would usually be impaired in such models and additively or synergistically affect the outcome, in a manner similar to real human patients. Consequently, in future research, simultaneous evaluation of dysfunction in more than two vital organs will be mandatory in such sepsis models. Additionally, the pathophysiology and therapeutic strategy for individual organ dysfunction should be more extensively examined using existing or newly developed single organ dysfunction models, including the septic ARDS model via the intratracheal administration of pathogens or PAMPs.

For such investigations, it is important to develop novel techniques to sequentially monitor organ function hopefully in vivo. To begin with, such research would be significantly enhanced by developing small-scale apparatus to monitor the partial pressure or saturation of arterial blood oxygen and arterial blood pressure. In addition, it would be important to incorporate measurements of serum bilirubin, creatinine, and urea nitrogen for in vivo monitoring across a range of animal models. In contrast, novel strategies need to be developed to enable the evaluation of species-specific parameters such as blood cells and proteins involved in the coagulation and fibrinolysis systems.

Conclusions

Excessive inflammation has been established as the key feature of sepsis pathophysiology and therefore a prime target of intervention. This understanding led us to the concept of SIRS, and sepsis was defined as the infection-induced SIRS. However, anti-inflammatory strategies have failed to improve clinical outcome in patients with sepsis. As described earlier, the definition of sepsis was drastically modified in 2016 so as not to include SIRS criteria and inflammatory variables. Instead, sepsis is now clinically defined by an increase in SOFA score. Thus, patients diagnosed with Sepsis-3 will inevitably represent a population different from that previously diagnosed. We assume that this drastic change in clinical definition will affect not only clinical practice but also the direction of future basic research.

Simultaneously evaluating multiple organ dysfunction in animal models of sepsis or investigating single organ dysfunction models will enable the development of potential organ-protective treatments in a robust experimental manner. Such organ-targeted investigations will certainly strengthen our understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis and may help to develop truly effective therapies to protect or recover from organ dysfunction in sepsis.

Abbreviations

AKI: 

Acute kidney injury

ALI: 

Acute lung injury

ARDS: 

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

DAMPs: 

Damage (danger)-associated molecular patterns

DIC: 

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

HMGB-1: 

High-mobility group box 1

IL-1β: 

Interleukin 1beta

ISTH: 

International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

JAAM: 

Japanese Association for Acute Medicine

LPS: 

Lipopolysaccharide

MODS: 

Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

PAMPs: 

Pathogen-associated molecular patterns

SIRS: 

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

SOFA: 

Sequential organ failure assessment

TNFα: 

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This study was funded by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26462767.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

SF drafted and completed the manuscript.

Competing interests

S. Fujishima is a task force member of the “Surviving Sepsis Guidelines 2016,” the “Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis,” and “Clinical Practice Guidelines” for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for General Medicine Education, Keio University School of Medicine

References

  1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conference. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(4):1250–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Pilcher D, Cooper DJ, Bellomo R. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(17):1629–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayashi T, Nakamura T, Takaoka A. Pattern recognition receptors. Jpn J Clin Immunol. 2011;34:329–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Schaefer L. Complexity of danger: the diverse nature of damage-associated molecular patterns. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(51):35237–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Opitz B, van Laak V, Eitel J, Suttorp N. Innate immune recognition in infectious and noninfectious diseases of the lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(12):1294–309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Okusawa S, Gelfand JA, Ikejima T, Connolly RJ, Dinarello CA. Interleukin 1 induces a shock-like state in rabbits. Synergism with tumor necrosis factor and the effect of cyclooxygenase inhibition. J Clin Invest. 1988;81(4):1162–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Tracey KJ, Beutler B, Lowry SF, Merryweather J, Wolpe S, Milsark IW, et al. Shock and tissue injury induced by recombinant human cachectin. Science. 1986;234(4775):470–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujishima S, Gando S, Daizoh S, Kushimoto S, Ogura H, Mayumi T, et al. Infection site is predictive of outcome in acute lung injury associated with severe sepsis and septic shock. Respirology. 2016;21(5):898–904.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sheu CC, Gong MN, Zhai R, Chen F, Bajwa EK, Clardy PF, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of sepsis-related vs non-sepsis-related ARDS. Chest. 2010;138(3):559–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Mallick AA, Ishizaka A, Stephens KE, Hatherill JR, Tazelaar HD, Raffin TA. Multiple organ damage caused by tumor necrosis factor and prevented by prior neutrophil depletion. Chest. 1989;95(5):1114–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Stephens KE, Ishizaka A, Wu ZH, Larrick JW, Raffin TA. Granulocyte depletion prevents tumor necrosis factor-mediated acute lung injury in guinea pigs. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;138(5):1300–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fujishima S, Aikawa N. Neutrophil-mediated tissue injury and its modulation. Intensive Care Med. 1995;21(3):277–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Luo L, Zhang S, Wang Y, Rahman M, Syk I, Zhang E, et al. Proinflammatory role of neutrophil extracellular traps in abdominal sepsis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2014;307(7):L586–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fujishima S. A prominent role of IL-8 in various inflammatory lung diseases and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Jpn J Inflamm. 1998;18(6):433–7.Google Scholar
  17. Wang H, Bloom O, Zhang M, Vishnubhakat JM, Ombrellino M, Che J, et al. HMG-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice. Science. 1999;285(5425):248–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ueno H, Matsuda T, Hashimoto S, Amaya F, Kitamura Y, Tanaka M, et al. Contributions of high mobility group box protein in experimental and clinical acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(12):1310–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, Sumi Y, Sursal T, Junger W, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464(7285):104–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Figueiredo N, Chora A, Raquel H, Pejanovic N, Pereira P, Hartleben B, et al. Anthracyclines induce DNA damage response-mediated protection against severe sepsis. Immunity. 2013;39(5):874–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hashimoto S, Kobayashi A, Kooguchi K, Kitamura Y, Onodera H, Nakajima H. Upregulation of two death pathways of perforin/granzyme and FasL/Fas in septic acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161(1):237–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fujishima S, Gando S, Saitoh D, Mayumi T, Kushimoto S, Shiraishi S, et al. A multicenter, prospective evaluation of quality of care and mortality in Japan based on the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. J Infect Chemother. 2014;20(2):115–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Levy MM, Dellinger RP, Townsend SR, Linde-Zwirble WT, Marshall JC, Bion J, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(2):367–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rivers EP, Kruse JA, Jacobsen G, Shah K, Loomba M, Otero R, et al. The influence of early hemodynamic optimization on biomarker patterns of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(9):2016–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nesseler N, Launey Y, Aninat C, Morel F, Malledant Y, Seguin P. Clinical review: the liver in sepsis. Crit Care. 2012;16(5):235.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(6):448–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Gerlach H, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(2):344–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zarbock A, Gomez H, Kellum JA. Sepsis-induced acute kidney injury revisited: pathophysiology, prevention and future therapies. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20(6):588–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Gando S, Levi M, Toh CH. Disseminated intravascular coagulation. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gando S, Saitoh D, Ogura H, Fujishima S, Mayumi T, Araki T, et al. A multicenter, prospective validation study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring system in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2013;17(3):R111.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Kienast J, Juers M, Wiedermann CJ, Hoffmann JN, Ostermann H, Strauss R, et al. Treatment effects of high-dose antithrombin without concomitant heparin in patients with severe sepsis with or without disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(1):90–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dhainaut JF, Yan SB, Joyce DE, Pettila V, Basson B, Brandt JT, et al. Treatment effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis with or without overt disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2(11):1924–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016