Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Immune-instructive copolymer scaffolds using plant-derived nanoparticles to promote bone regeneration

Inflammation and Regeneration volume 42, Article number: 12 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Age-driven immune signals cause a state of chronic low-grade inflammation and in consequence affect bone healing and cause challenges for clinicians when repairing critical-sized bone defects in elderly patients.

Methods

Poly(l-lactide-co-ɛ-caprolactone) (PLCA) scaffolds are functionalized with plant-derived nanoparticles from potato, rhamnogalacturonan-I (RG-I), to investigate their ability to modulate inflammation in vitro in neutrophils and macrophages at gene and protein levels. The scaffolds’ early and late host response at gene, protein and histological levels is tested in vivo in a subcutaneous rat model and their potential to promote bone regeneration in an aged rodent was tested in a critical-sized calvaria bone defect. Significant differences were tested using one-way ANOVA, followed by a multiple-comparison Tukey’s test with a p value ≤ 0.05 considered significant.

Results

Gene expressions revealed PLCA scaffold functionalized with plant-derived RG-I with a relatively higher amount of galactose than arabinose (potato dearabinated (PA)) to reduce the inflammatory state stimulated by bacterial LPS in neutrophils and macrophages in vitro. LPS-stimulated neutrophils show a significantly decreased intracellular accumulation of galectin-3 in the presence of PA functionalization compared to Control (unmodified PLCA scaffolds). The in vivo gene and protein expressions revealed comparable results to in vitro. The host response is modulated towards anti-inflammatory/ healing at early and late time points at gene and protein levels. A reduced foreign body reaction and fibrous capsule formation is observed when PLCA scaffolds functionalized with PA were implanted in vivo subcutaneously. PLCA scaffolds functionalized with PA modulated the cytokine and chemokine expressions in vivo during early and late inflammatory phases. PLCA scaffolds functionalized with PA implanted in calvaria defects of aged rats downregulating pro-inflammatory gene markers while promoting osteogenic markers after 2 weeks in vivo.

Conclusion

We have shown that PLCA scaffolds functionalized with plant-derived RG-I with a relatively higher amount of galactose play a role in the modulation of inflammatory responses both in vitro and in vivo subcutaneously and promote the initiation of bone formation in a critical-sized bone defect of an aged rodent. Our study addresses the increasing demand in bone tissue engineering for immunomodulatory 3D scaffolds that promote osteogenesis and modulate immune responses.

Background

Global average age expectancy is increasing [1]. This leads to an inevitable increase in chronic age-related diseases [2], such as osteoporosis and osteoarthritis [3].

Age-driven immune signals cause a state of chronic low-grade inflammation and in consequence affects the potency of endogenous stem cells [4]. This could explain the challenges facing surgeons while reconstructing critical-sized bone defects in elderly patients. These very often require bone augmentation using an autogenous bone graft, which is associated with clinical drawbacks, related to limited tissue availability, that increase patient morbidity [5] and risk of infections at the donor surgical site [6]. Thus, there is an increasing demand in bone tissue engineering for immunomodulatory three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds that promote osteogenesis and modulate immune responses, by delivering bioactive factors. The success of bone healing is vastly determined by the initial inflammatory phase, which is affected by both the local and systemic factors. Moreover, bone healing is modulated by intracellular pathways and cell-to-cell communications [7]. Cells that play the main role in modulating bone healing are immune cells and progenitor cells [8]. Any discrepancy in the number or activity of these cells may cause a prolonged inflammatory response leading to chronic inflammation that can impair the new bone formation.

Recent studies demonstrated the immunomodulatory properties of plant-derived molecules, mainly represented by the polysaccharide, called rhamnogalacturonan-I (RG-I) [9]. The RG-I is a subunit of pectin composed of a backbone of alternating rhamnose and galacturonic acid residues, with arabinose and galactose side chains present on the rhamnosyl residues. The RG-I structure mimics the polysaccharides from the extracellular matrix of mammals [10] and therefore has been proposed as a bioactive molecule to stimulate cell response during bone healing [11]. Recent studies showed that specifically RG-I with a relatively high content of galactose (Gal) compared to the content of arabinose, stimulate adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of macrophages [12], fibroblasts [13], osteoblasts [14,15,16,17], and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells [18, 19]. In addition, it has been reported that RG-I may also possess anti-inflammatory properties [12, 20,21,22]. The RG-I interaction with β-integrins prevents neutrophil adhesion to fibronectin, which represents a key step in the inflammatory response [20]. Also, the branched region of RG-I has been reported to be responsible for the proliferation of B lymphocytes [9]. Well-established methods for controlling the modification of pectin’s structure have opened new possibilities for using these plant-derived molecules as tissue engineering matrices [23, 24].

Copolymers, poly(l-lactide-co-É›-caprolactone) (PLCA), have been investigated as a promising material for bone tissue engineering by proving cytocompatibility and osteoconductivity both in vitro and in vivo [25]. They are inherently hydrophobic, and they lack native cell recognition sites [26], which makes their interaction with cells dependent on the unspecific adsorption of proteins from the surrounding biological fluids [25]. It is therefore desirable to functionalize PLCA intended for bone tissue engineering with specific bioactive signals. Several functionalizations, including modifications with nanodiamonds [27, 28], Tween 80 [29], or adsorption of bone morphogenetic protein 2 [30,31,32] or human demineralized dentine matrix [33] have been investigated to improve osteogenic properties. However, simultaneous targeting to the osteogenic and immune milieu has been a challenge. Therefore, modified RG-I to functionalize PLCA scaffolds would be a promising concept to stimulate immunomodulation and promote bone regeneration while lowering the risk of undesirable inflammation.

In this study, we functionalized PLCA scaffolds with RG-I to investigate their ability to modulate inflammation in vitro and in vivo, as well as to promote bone regeneration in an aged rodent model.

Methods

PLCA scaffold fabrication

The PLCA scaffolds were prepared using the solvent-casting particulate leaching method as previously described [31]. Copolymers (‘Resomer LC 703 S’, Evonik, Essen, Germany) were used with the number average molecular mass Mn = 142 kg mol−1 (Ɖ = 1.5) and composition in a mole ratio of 70 for l-lactide and 30 for ε-carprolactone. Scaffolds were punched out in different dimensions for in vitro and in vivo experiments. The scaffolds for in vitro studies were 12 mm in diameter and 1.3 mm in thickness and for in vivo scaffolds were 5 mm in diameter and 1.3 mm in thickness. The scaffold porosity was > 83% with an average pore size of 90–500 μm, measured by micro-computed tomography (Skyscan 1172, Bruker, MA, US) (40-kV and 2.4-μm voxel). Scaffolds were washed twice with ethanol 70%, followed by sterilization under ultraviolet light.

Isolation of RG-I and functionalization of PLCA scaffolds with RG-I

RG-I was isolated and modified by an enzymatic treatment of the potato pulp as described previously [34]. Briefly, the arabinan side chains of unmodified potato RG-I (PU) were shortened with α-l-arabinofuranosidase and endo-arabinanase (Novozymes, Bagsværd, Denmark) and the modified form was named potato RG-I dearabinated (PA). The monosaccharide composition and linkage analysis of PU and PA have been reported previously [14, 34]. The PLCA scaffolds placed in multi-well polystyrene plates were physiosorbed with 500 μg/mL PU or PA and allowed to shake in a plate shaker (MixMate® Eppendorf, Germany) at 100 rpm overnight at room temperature. Unfunctionalized PLCA scaffolds were used as Control, while functionalized PLCA scaffolds with unmodified potato RG-I (PU scaffold) and with potato RG-I dearabinated (PA scaffold) were tested groups.

Scaffold characterization

Atomic force microscopy

PLCA scaffolds (Control, PU, PA) were prepared for imaging with atomic force microscopy (AFM) by collecting small particles of varying sizes using a 15-blade scalpel. The particles were fixed to AFM discs of steel with an 18-mm diameter. The 3D scans were done using the AFM Force Microscope NX-20 (Park Systems, South Korea) with a feedback-controlled XY scan table and a maximum scan range of approximately 100 μm × 100 μm. It was equipped with a linearized Z-scanner with a maximum dynamic range of approximately 8 μm. A super-sharp scanning probe with a tip radius of nominally < 2 nm (SSS-NCH, Nanosensors, Switzerland) was applied to provide technical pixel resolution and to avoid feature blurring. The 3D scans were performed using the intermittent imaging technique. In addition to topographic features, variations of the interacting forces between the tip and the surface are recorded as changes in the phase signal of the tip oscillations in intermittent mode. The mapping of these force variations can help to localize different materials, for instance.

Confocal microscopy

PLCA scaffolds functionalized with PU and PA were visualized using immunofluorescence labelling and confocal microscopy. Functionalized and unfactionalized PLCA scaffolds were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min before blocking with 5% skimmed milk (pH 7.2) for 15 min. PLCA scaffolds were incubated with anti-(1→4)-β-galactan LM5 (Plant Probes, Leeds, UK) (1:10) at room temperature for 2 h with shaking. The antibody was diluted in 5% skimmed milk. Goat anti-rat fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) IgG (1:200) (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) was used as a secondary antibody and incubated for 2 h with shaking. After washing with PBS, PLCA scaffolds were visualized using a Leica TCS-SP5 II confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems, Exton, PA, USA) and images captured with PL FLUOTAR 10/× 0.30 dry objective.

In vitro inflammatory evaluation

Cell isolation, maintenance, and scaffold cell-seeding

Peripheral blood for polymorphonuclear neutrophils’ (PMN) isolation was collected from healthy donors (n = 3) following informed consent. PMN were isolated from heparinized (10 U/mL) peripheral blood using Percoll density gradients (GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA) as previously described [35]. Briefly, two discontinuous gradients, 1.079 and 1.098, were used for PMN isolation with concomitant erythrocyte lysis (0.83% ammonium chloride containing 1% potassium bicarbonate, 0.04% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 0.25% bovine serum albumin). Isolated cells were resuspended in PBS and a viability of > 98% was determined. PMNs were seeded (1 × 105/mL) on functionalized or unfunctionalized PLCA scaffolds and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from heparinized (10 U/mL) blood by centrifugation on Ficoll-PaqueTM Plus (GE Healthcare) as previously described [36]. PBMC were resuspended in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) supplemented with 2.5% human AB serum (BioSera, France), 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 100 U/mL penicillin, 2mM l-glutamine (all from Sigma-Aldrich). PBMC were seeded (1 × 105/mL) on functionalized or unfunctionalized PLCA scaffolds and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2 to obtain adherent monocytes. After 2 h, the medium containing non-adherent cells was replaced with a fresh medium. The adherent monocytes were then incubated for 5 days at 37 °C with 5% CO2 to allow differentiation into macrophages.

Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (E. coli LPS) stimulation

After 30 min of incubation, PMN cultured on functionalized or unfunctionalized were treated with E. coli serotype O26:B6 LPS (Sigma-Aldrich L5543; Sigma-Aldrich) at 100 ng/mL. PMN were cultured in the presence of E. coli LPS for 4 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2 prior to downstream analysis. After 5 days of incubation, adherent macrophages from PBMC cultured on functionalized or unfunctionalized scaffolds were treated with E. coli serotype O26:B6 LPS (Sigma-Aldrich) at 100 ng/mL and incubated for 6 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2 prior to downstream analysis.

In vitro ELISA

Total protein was isolated from in vitro scaffolds seeded with PMN. Briefly, culture media was removed from scaffolds and PMN were washed twice with cold PBS. Scaffolds with PMN were incubated at 4 °C for 20 min with RIPA buffer (Thermo Scientific). After sonification for 1 min and centrifugation at 16,000g at 4 °C for 20 min, the supernatant was collected and stored at 80 °C until use. The galectin-3 levels were quantified in collected supernatant using human galectin-3 immunoassay (Human Galectin-3 Quantikine ELISA Kit DGAL30, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

In vivo inflammatory response and bone regeneration evaluation

Results from in vitro analyses lead to the preselection of PLCA scaffolds functionalized with RG-I dearabinated (PA scaffolds) for further in vivo experiments.

Rat subcutaneous model

Two incisions (~ 2 cm) were made on the back of 6–8-week-old Wistar rats after being anesthetized using isoflurane (Isoba® vet) (Schering Plough, NJ, USA). A pouch was dissected on each side and the unfunctionalized PLCA scaffolds (Control) or functionalized PLCA scaffolds (PA) were implanted subcutaneously and randomly distributed among all rats (at least n = 5 rats per time point). Wounds were sutured with Vicryl 4-0, and the animals were given buprenorphine (Temgesic® 0.3 mg/kg) subcutaneously as analgesic. Animals were euthanized with CO2 overdose at 4 days (acute inflammatory response) and 4 weeks (chronic inflammatory response) after implantation. The samples were harvested and stored in RNAlater (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at − 80 °C until processed.

Calvaria bone defect model in aged rats

Aged Wistar rats (11–12 months old) were used to evaluate the inflammatory response and bone formation promoted by the functionalized scaffolds in an environment comparable to aged patients. Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (Isoba® vet). Using aseptic techniques, a 2-cm anteroposterior cranial skin incision was made along the midline. The subcutaneous tissues and periosteum were dissected before a full-thickness defect (5-mm diameter) was created in the central area of each parietal bone using a trephine drill. Unfunctionalized PLCA scaffolds (Control), functionalized PLCA scaffold (PA), or autograft (Auto) were implanted in the defects before the periosteum and skin were repositioned and sutured with Vicryl 4-0. The autograft was cut into four fragments before being placed in the contralateral defect of the same animal. The autograft group aims to represent the autologous bone grafting technique. The animals were given buprenorphine (Temgesic® 0.3 mg/kg) subcutaneously as analgesic. After 2 weeks, animals were euthanized with CO2 overdose.

In vitro and in vivo gene expressions using real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from in vitro scaffolds seeded with PMN or macrophages using Trizol (Sigma) and the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Using a tissue RNA isolation kit (Maxwell®, Promega, Madison, USA), total RNA was isolated from in vivo scaffolds. Quantity and purity were checked using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA (300 ng) was reverse transcribed using a high-capacity complementary DNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR was conducted on a Light Cycler 480 SYBR Green I Master real-time PCR instrument (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). Target genes for in vitro and in vivo experiments were tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß), interleukin-1alpha (IL-1α), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-10 (IL-10), galectin-1 (Gal-1), galectin-3 (Gal-3) Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), interleukin-6 (IL-6), transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-ß) and colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF1R). The comparative 2−ΔΔCt method was performed for analysis of relative gene expression data, as previously described [37]. Relative expressions were calculated after normalization to housekeeping genes, beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) for in vitro and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) for in vivo.

In vivo cytokine analysis using multiplex fluorescent bead-based immunoassay

Protein was isolated from harvested Control and PA scaffolds from the in vivo subcutaneous model by incubating them under shaking conditions at 4 °C for 20 min with RIPA buffer (Thermo Scientific), 1 × Halt™ protease inhibitor cocktail, and 1 × Halt™ phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific). After sonication for 5 min and centrifugation at 16,000g at 4 °C for 20 min, collected supernatant was quantified for protein using BCA assay (Pierce® BCA Protein assay kit, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Standardized protein amounts were used in a Bio-Plex Rat 23-plex kit (Catalogue #12005641) (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) using the Luminex platform (Luminex®) for the processing of the Bio-Plex® 200 systems according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The amount of protein in each sample was extrapolated and compared with the standard curve ranges with concentrations reported in pg/mL.

Histology and descriptive semi-quantitative histological evaluation

Retrieved samples from the in vivo subcutaneous model were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, before decalcification using 10% EDTA (Merck & Co, White House Station, NJ, USA) and paraffin embedding. Sections of 3–4 μm were stained with hematoxylin/eosin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Qualitative and semiquantitative histological evaluation was carried out to assess the tissues’ response to the implanted scaffolds. Sections were evaluated blindly by two researchers independently under a light microscope (Leica, Solms, Germany). The infiltration of inflammatory cells inside the scaffold and that in direct contact with it, as well as the presence and quality of fibrous capsules were randomly evaluated in six fields of vision of each section (magnification 400×) using a scoring system we previously reported [32]. Infiltrated cells evaluated were those involved in acute inflammatory responses (neutrophils and plasma cells) and those involved in chronic responses (lymphocytes and foreign body giant cells).

Statistical analyses

Data are presented as the mean values ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Significant differences were tested using one-way ANOVA, followed by a multiple comparison Tukey test using SPSS version 22 (IBM, NY, USA). A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

PLCA scaffolds were successfully functionalized with plant derived nanoparticle RG-I in unmodified (PU) and modified (PA) form

Atomic force microscopy

Particles collected from the various PLCA scaffolds were between 200 and 600 μm in size. The functionalized and unfunctionalized scaffolds were analysed on an area of 1 μm × 1 μm each with a typical height range (topographical Peak-Valley) of approximately 50 nm and 512 × 512 pixels, corresponding to a theoretical lateral resolution of approximately 2 nm. The colour map of the 3D images is scaled to the phase contrast of the intermittent scan mode and superimposed on the 3D topographic data. The 3D analyses allowed to measure the overall height variation that was approximately ± 25 nm, without showing outstanding features such as grooves or protruding lines (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1
figure 1

(A) Representative 3D images of unfunctionalized PLCA (Control), PU functionalized PLCA (PU), PA functionalized PLCA (PA) measured with intermittent imaging technique, multimode atomic force microscopy (AFM) 1μm Å ~ 1 μm with height range (topographical Peak-Valley) of approximately 50 nm and 512 × 512 pixels, corresponding to a theoretical lateral resolution of approximately 2 nm. PU, potato unmodified; PA, potato dearabinated; PLCA, poly(l-lactide-co-ɛ-caprolactone). (B) Representative confocal images of unfunctionalized PLCA scaffold (Control), functionalized PLCA scaffold with PU (PU), and functionalized with PA (PA)

Full size image

The unfunctionalized PLCA scaffold (Control) showed a small range of contrast variations with individual speckles and slightly brighter or lower shades of the orange background. In the PU functionalized PLCA scaffold (PU), the same background variation can be seen as in the control, however with sharper features of higher contrast distributed over the area. These features are approximately between 10–20 nm long and 5–10 nm wide. The PA functionalized PLCA scaffold (PA) showed a linear pattern of coating, and a line in the centre of the image approximately 450 nm long and 5–10 nm wide is clearly visible.

Confocal microscopy

The confocal images showed the presence of PU and PA on the functionalized PLCA scaffolds surface compared to Control (Fig. 1B). The regions of the scaffold coated with PU showed less intense fluorescence compared to the PA-coated scaffold. The higher fluorescence emission indicates the presence of a higher amount of galactan domains on the scaffold coated with PA.

PLCA scaffolds functionalized with PU and PA modulated the inflammatory response of PMN and macrophages in vitro

Response of early and late inflammatory cells under E. coli LPS stimulation

The real-time PCR data revealed the downregulation in PU and PA scaffolds of the pro-inflammatory genes tested and the upregulation of the anti-inflammatory gene IL-10 (Fig 2). Relative to the control scaffolds (Control), the differences in expression among all tested genes were highly significant except for TGF-β1 and CSF1R from PMN and IL-1α and TGF-β1 expression from macrophages.

Fig. 2
figure 2

(A) Relative mRNA expression of selected genes expressed in the LPS-stimulated human polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) cultured on Control (unfunctionalized) scaffolds, scaffolds coated with unmodified RG-I (PU) or on scaffolds coated with dearabinated RG-I (PA). (B) Galectin-3 levels quantified in LPS- stimulated PMN cultured on unfunctionalized (control) PLCA scaffolds, PU or PA-functionalized scaffolds. (C) Relative mRNA expression of selected genes expressed in the LPS-stimulated human monocyte-derived macrophages cultured on unfunctionalized PLCA scaffolds (Control), functionalized PLCA scaffolds with PU, and with PA. Data presented as fold change normalized to B2M (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

Full size image

The expression levels of all selected genes in the LPS-stimulated PMNs cultured on scaffolds functionalized with PU and PA were comparable. However, the expression of TLR4 and IL-8 was significantly lower in cells from the scaffolds coated with PA compared to PU. Galectin 3 (Gal-3) was downregulated in PU and PA compared to Control, with lower expression in PU compared to PA albeit insignificant. LPS-stimulated PMN showed a significantly decreased intracellular accumulation of galectin-3 in the presence of PA functionalization compared to Control (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2B). However, scaffold functionalized with PU did not significantly affect the level of galectin-3 produced by LPS-stimulated PMN (9 ng/mL) when compared with Control scaffolds (11 ng/mL).

In monocyte-derived macrophages the expression of most of the evaluated inflammatory genes was reduced on PU and PA functionalized scaffolds compared to Control (Fig. 2C). The expressions of Gal-1 and Gal-3 were significantly lower in the PA compared to the PU group. By contrast, gene expression of the anti-inflammatory markers IL10 and CSF1R showed a reversed pattern, where PA significantly upregulated the expression of these genes compared to the Control.

PLCA scaffolds functionalized with PA modulated the host response in vivo towards an anti-inflammatory response at early and late time points

Our results indicated a positive effect of PA functionalization compared to PU on neutrophils and macrophages cultured in vitro. Therefore, the PA scaffold group was pre-selected to be further evaluated in the in vivo studies.

Gene expression of early and late inflammatory responses after 4 days and 4 weeks in vivo

In vivo gene expression showed comparable trends to the in vitro gene expressions (Fig. 3 A and B). In the acute inflammatory phase, PA functionalized scaffolds exhibited a general downregulation of pro-inflammatory genes, including Gal-1, Gal-3, TNF-α, IL-1α, IL-1β, TLR2, and TLR4 (Fig. 3A). Relative to the Control group, the differences among pro-inflammatory genes were significant only for Gal-1, Gal-3, TLR2, and IL-1α.

Fig. 3
figure 3

(A) Relative mRNA expression after 4 days in vivo of selected genes from unfunctionalized PLCA scaffolds (Control) and PA functionalized scaffolds. (B) after 4 weeks in vivo. Data are presented as fold change normalized to GAPDH. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

Full size image

On the other hand, and in contrast to the in vitro results, PA slightly upregulated the expression of pro-inflammatory marker IL-6, albeit insignificant. The expressions of CSF1R and TGF-β1 from PA and Control were comparable. In contrast to the pro-inflammatory markers’ expressions, PA significantly increased the expression of the anti-inflammatory marker IL-10. Therefore, PLCA scaffolds functionalized with PA reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory markers and significantly promoted the anti-inflammatory markers’ expression in acute inflammatory response compared to Control.

In the late time point, after 4 weeks, the level of gene expression was comparable between Control and PA (Fig. 3B). In contrast to the trend seen in both in vitro and day 4 in vivo, PA functionalized scaffolds exhibited slight upregulation of pro-inflammatory TLR2 and TLR4 (p < 0.01) at week 4. After 4 weeks in vivo, the level of the anti-inflammatory marker IL-10 was significantly upregulated in PA. The mRNA expression of IL-10 was highly upregulated in PA during the acute inflammatory response and remained highly expressed in the late response as well.

A reduced foreign body reaction and fibrous capsule formation was observed when PLCA scaffolds functionalized with PA were implanted in vivo subcutaneously.

The inflammatory response after scaffold implantation was also examined histologically after 4 days and 4 weeks to evaluate early and late acute host response respectively. In the acute host response, the fibrous encapsulation was more prominent in the control PLCA scaffold group (Control) compared to PA (Fig. 4A, black arrows). Most of the Control scaffolds were surrounded by fibrous capsules with a maximum thickness of 4 layers. No inflammatory cells were microscopically detected in the capsule formed around Control scaffolds. However, few inflammatory cells, mainly represented by lymphocytes were detected in the capsule surrounding PA scaffolds at 4 days. The quantity and diversity of inflammatory cells infiltrated into the scaffold pores were comparable between Control and PA groups (no significant differences), and the lymphocytes and PMNs were the main inflammatory cells recruited in the acute phase both at the periphery and the centre of the scaffold (Fig. 4A, green arrows). Very few multinucleated foreign body giant cells were observed at day 4 in both scaffold groups in comparison to the late time point.

Fig. 4
figure 4

(A) Upper panel: Representative micrographs of hematoxylin/eosin-stained sections from unfunctionalized PLCA scaffolds (Control) and PLCA scaffolds functionalized with PA (PA) at 4 days. Magnification 100×. Lower panel: Histological grading of fibrous tissue capsule and inflammatory cell infiltration at day 4 (early inflammatory response) post implantation of Control and PA scaffolds. Data expressed as average score (*p < 0.05). (B) Upper panel: Representative micrographs of hematoxylin/eosin-stained sections from Control scaffolds and PA scaffolds at 4 weeks. Magnification 400×. Lower panel: Histological grading of fibrous tissue capsule and inflammatory cell infiltration at 4 weeks post-implantation (late inflammatory response) Control and PA scaffolds. Data expressed as average score (*p < 0.05)

Full size image

At week 4 a fibrous encapsulation was seen in both Control and PA groups, however, compared to the early phase, Control and PA functionalized scaffolds developed a capsule composed mainly of fibroblasts. Consistent with the early time point, the PA scaffold group showed a significantly reduced thickness of the capsule than the Control group after 4 weeks (Fig. 4B, black arrows). The scaffold pores from both groups were infiltrated with fibrous connective tissue made of mature fibroblasts and blood vessels (Fig. 4B). Moreover, the lymphocytes and PMNs were replaced with foreign body giant cells (FBGC) and plasma cells, with more FBGC observed close to the scaffold structure in both Control and PA scaffolds (Fig. 4B). The PA group was observed to recruit a comparable number of inflammatory cells to the Control, with no significant differences.

PLCA scaffolds functionalized with PA modulated the cytokine and chemokine expressions in vivo during early and late inflammatory phases

The expression of all evaluated proteins after 4 weeks was remarkably lower compared to the expressions in the early phase response, after 4 days (Table S1 and S2). However, TNF-α increased by four folds on Control scaffolds at 4 weeks compared to 4 days, while on PA the expression was opposite (Fig. 5 A and B). TNF-α after 4 days was significantly lower on Control scaffolds compared to PA (p = 0.05), while at 4 weeks, it was significantly higher (5-fold) on Control compared to PA (p = 0.028). The expression of macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha MIP-1α from Control scaffolds was increased (6-fold) after 4 weeks compared to 4 days, while from PA scaffolds, the levels remained the same. Within the 4 days’ time point, MIP-1α was significantly higher on the PA scaffold compared to Control (p = 0.02), while within the 4 weeks’ time point, it was expressed twice as high from the Control scaffold compared to PA scaffold (Fig. 5 A and B) (Table S1 and S2).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Cytokine profile from subcutaneously implanted unfunctionalized (Control) and functionalized (PA) scaffolds (A) 4 days and (B) 4 weeks post-implantation. Data are presented on a logarithmic scale (Log 10). Statistically significant readings are highlighted by circles. Black circle p < 0.05, Grey circle p < 0.01

Full size image

After 4 days, the chemokine regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) (p = 0.043) and GM-CSF (p = 0.009) were significantly higher on PA scaffolds compared to Control. After 4 weeks only G-CSF was significantly higher on PA compared to Control (p = 0.03), while MIP-3α (p = 0.036) and IL-12 (p = 0.016) were found to be significantly lower on PA scaffolds compared to Control (Fig. 5 A and B) (Table S1 and S2).

PLCA scaffolds functionalized with PA implanted in calvaria defects of aged rats downregulating pro-inflammatory gene markers while promoting osteogenic markers after 2 weeks in vivo

The in vivo gene expressions from calvaria bone defects in aged rats showed upregulation of osteogenic genes and downregulation of pro-inflammatory genes on PA scaffolds compared to autograft and/or Control scaffolds (Fig. 6). The osteogenic markers, collagen, type I, alpha 1 (COL-Iα1) and osteocalcin, were significantly upregulated on PA functionalized scaffolds compared to autograft and Control scaffolds, while bone sialoprotein was significantly upregulated on PA functionalized scaffold compared to autograft only. The receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) was significantly downregulated and minimally expressed on PA functionalized scaffolds compared to Control and autograft. Furthermore, the autograft group stimulated high gene expressions of RANKL, but also the inflammatory markers, TNFα, IL-6, and IL-1β. The inflammatory marker, IL-1β was significantly downregulated on PA functionalized scaffold compared to autograft and IL-6 was significantly downregulated on PA compared to autograft and Control scaffolds. The TNFα was significantly downregulated on PA functionalized scaffold and Control compared to autograft.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Relative mRNA expression of selected inflammatory and early bone-forming markers from different groups implanted in aged rat calvaria bone defects after 2 weeks. Unfunctionalized scaffold (Control), functionalized scaffold (PA), and autograft. Data are presented as fold change normalized to GAPDH (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we successfully functionalized PLCA scaffolds with RG-I and confirmed its ability to modulate inflammation both in vitro and in vivo, while promoting bone regeneration in an aged rodent model.

PLCA scaffolds functionalized with RG-I modulated pro- and anti-inflammatory markers in vitro and in vivo at the gene level, which were translated to protein and expressed in cytokine levels detected in vivo. Furthermore, our results suggested that plant-derived RG-I with a relatively higher amount of galactose (PA) than arabinose may play a crucial role in the modulation of inflammatory response induced by bacterial LPS. The inhibition of pro-inflammatory and stimulation of anti-inflammatory markers by PA functionalized PLCA scaffolds resulted in an increased level of osteogenic genes in the calvaria rat model compared to control. In addition, the RANKL and TNF-α expression on PA functionalized PLCA scaffolds was significantly lower compared to Autograft, indicating a decreased risk of resorption and chronic inflammation.

In our in vitro experiments, the pro-inflammatory response from PMN and macrophages was significantly reduced on PA functionalized PLCA scaffold compared to control, by downregulation of mRNA expressions of inflammatory markers, such as IL6, TNF-α, IL8, IL1α, and IL1β. Interestingly, the anti-inflammatory response was significantly induced by upregulation of IL-10 expression in the PMN and macrophages cultured. These results suggest that RG-I may modulate early (24–48 h) and late (2–7 days) inflammatory processes in vitro. Furthermore, the findings showed that modified RG-I with a relative higher content of galactose (PA) had a stronger effect on gene expression compared to unmodified RG-I (PU). The in vivo results after 4 days and 4 weeks confirmed anti-inflammatory properties of PA functionalized PLCA scaffolds as the IL-10 expression was significantly increased compared to control. Several studies demonstrated that cell response is affected by the chemical and structural composition of RG-I side chains [13,14,15, 17, 18, 38]. Pectins have also shown to exert immune effects via interaction with pattern recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors [39]. In fact, a previous study postulated that the highly branched side chains of pectins are essential for their anti-inflammatory properties on IL-6 secretion from LPS-induced macrophages [40]. The structural part of RG-I that has been identified to modulate immune responses is the galactan side chain, which binds to the carbohydrate recognition domain of galectins [41]. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is particularly expressed on immune cells, such as monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, and epithelial cells [42]. These immune cells use Gal-3 as a pattern recognition receptor to induce innate immune responses against pathogens, such as bacterial infection [43]. The galactan side chain of RG-I may enhance the anti-pathogenic effect by binding to Gal-3 [39, 44]. In fact, our results of Gal-3 expression at protein level from PMN culture showed a significant decrease in its accumulation intracellularly in the presence of PA. Furthermore, mRNA expression of Gal-3 and Gal-1 was significantly reduced in macrophage cultures on PA compared to PU scaffolds. However, when PLCA scaffolds were previously functionalized with demineralized dentin matrix, the levels of IL-6 and IL-8 mRNA from bone marrow–derived stem cells were increased compared to control [33]. This confirms the role played by RG-I and galectins in damping the inflammatory response from immune cells.

In addition, downregulation of pattern recognition receptors, TLR-2 and TLR-4 was observed in both neutrophils and macrophages cultured on the PA scaffold. This is in line with several studies that demonstrated that pectins inhibit LPS-induced TLR-2 and TLR-4 activation in monocytes, which has been proposed to be via its galactan binding mechanism [40, 45]. Our in vitro findings of downregulated Gal-3 and TLR-4 in monocytes, leading to upregulation of IL-10 gene expressions, confirms a direct interaction between Gal-3 and TLR-4. Similar findings were reported previously in an inflammatory mouse model suggesting that their inhibition promotes anti-inflammatory effects [46]. Furthermore, high levels of Gal-3 expression because of bacterial infection drives neutrophil infiltration and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [47,48,49,50]. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that inhibition of Gal-3 by the galactan side chain may lead to a positive modulation of inflammation.

In our subcutaneous rat model, mRNA from harvested scaffolds showed significant downregulation of Gal-1, Gal-3, TLR-2, and TLR-4 expression after 4 days by PA-functionalized PLCA scaffolds. This is comparable to our in vitro results. However, this pattern of expression was not seen after 4 weeks in vivo. In fact, TLR-4 was significantly increased in PA scaffolds, compared to Control, which may suggest RG-I properties to only modulate acute inflammatory host responses. On the contrary, when PLCA scaffolds were previously functionalized with nanodiamond particles and their host response was evaluated subcutaneously in a mouse model, they showed an increased acute inflammatory response at gene level that was significantly downregulated after 8 weeks [32]. This difference in our in vitro and in vivo responses can also be explained by a difference in the experimental models since the animal model was not challenged by an LPS induction. Furthermore, modulation of acute responses observed with RG-I functionalization might be beneficial for the reduction of post-operative infection risks.

Furthermore, the cytokine level expressed in vivo from the harvested scaffolds, demonstrated the pro-inflammatory chemokine RANTES significantly lower on PA compared to Control after 4 days, suggesting a reduction in unwanted acute inflammatory responses. RANTES and MIP-1α, which have CCR5 and CCL3 as ligands respectively, are involved in pro-inflammatory responses and are targeted for therapeutics in chronic inflammatory diseases [51]. The RG-I structure was shown to mimic the glycosaminoglycans’ structure [52,53,54] and the presence of glycosaminoglycans has been reported to modulate the oligomerization of MIP-1α and RANTES via the N-termini of CC chemokines [55]. Therefore, PA could have affected the levels of MIP-1α and RANTES. Another significant differential expression at the protein level was seen from GM-CSF. Several pro- and anti-inflammatory mechanisms of action for GM-CSF were described and suggested that its action is determined by the presence or absence of other relevant cytokines [56]. In our results, GM-CSF’s concentration was expressed significantly higher on PA scaffolds compared to Control scaffolds, albeit its absolute concentration was relatively low compared to other cytokines. Therefore, the results need to be analysed in a holistic context relevant to the overall immune response.

The cytokines expressed from the different scaffolds after 4 weeks showed significantly higher levels of pro-inflammatory markers, IL-12 and TNF-α on Control scaffolds compared to PA scaffolds. In fact, both cytokines are secreted by activated macrophages and are involved in mechanisms of fibrosis [57]. These findings correlate with our histological observations, which indicated a thicker layer of fibrous capsule around the unfunctionalized Control scaffolds. Furthermore, MIP-3α was expressed significantly lower on PA scaffolds compared to Control scaffolds, which may support the reduction of chronic inflammation during late stages of bone formation [58].

Bone healing is highly dependent on the initial inflammatory phase after injury, which is affected by both local and systemic host responses to the surgical procedure and grafting biomaterial. The highly controlled pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory phases generated by the immune system are essential to create the conditions for successful bone tissue repair/regeneration. The healing response to a biomaterial is often initiated by fibrous encapsulation, where its progression is an indicator of the biocompatibility of the biomaterial [59]. The long-term host response to an implanted scaffold is affected by many factors, one of which is the scaffold degradation. The optimal degradation rate of the scaffold should correspond to the rate of bone tissue regeneration. Another important requirement is that the breakdown products of the degradation process must not be toxic without causing a prolonged foreign body reaction [60]. We found that PLCA scaffolds functionalized with PA significantly reduced the thickness of the fibrotic capsule formation in the rat subcutaneous model compared to Control scaffolds at week 4. Decreased capsule thicknesses facilitate cell infiltration and promote tissue regeneration. Numerous studies reported that the size of the fibrotic capsule can be regulated through the addition of different bioactive molecules such as growth factors and proteins to stimulate the regeneration process [59]. The observed slight decrease in the number of foreign body giant cells in PA functionalized PLCA scaffolds (at both time points) compared to Control may indicate a milder foreign body reaction. These histological observations in our current study have been coupled in our previous reports with a faster degradation for functionalized scaffolds with nanodiamonds compared to unfunctionalized PLCA scaffolds [32]. The degradation process of aliphatic polyesters such as PLCA occurs by bulk hydrolysis that causes cleavage of ester bonds and decrease in molecular weight. This is followed by a second phase characterized by foreign body giant cells that engulf the breakdown. Degradation analysis was not carried out for our functionalized PA scaffolds; however, we extensively studied the degradation of the unfunctionalized PLCA scaffolds previously both in vitro and in vivo [32, 61]. There, we reported that after almost 2–3 months, 60–70% of the number average molecular weight was decreased in vivo. This rate of degradation was accelerated when the PLCA scaffolds were functionalized to increase wettability [32]. Since RG-I is known to increase wettability of surfaces [14, 62], we postulate a faster hydrolysis of our functionalized PA scaffolds compared to Control. The degradation rate of polymeric scaffolds can be tailored by using different monomers in the copolymer or functionalizing with other hydrophilic factors [60, 61]. The scaffold’s porosity and pore size is also critical for degradation [60, 63]. Our PLCA scaffolds have interconnected porosity that was optimized previously [64, 65] for cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation as well as new bone and capillary formation [66, 67].

Tuning and controlling degradation is not only important for the support corresponding to the rate of bone tissue regeneration, however it is also necessary for the release profile of RG-I. Controlling the release of bioactive factors can be carried out by either physically or chemically functionalizing the copolymer scaffolds [30]. In our study, we functionalized PLCA by simple physisorption, which is a functionalization method proven to burst an early release of the bioactive factor [30]. To control and instruct acute inflammation, an early release of the anti-inflammatory molecule might be beneficial. However, in other circumstances when bone-inducing molecules are to be released, a more sustained long-term release was shown to be more efficient [30]. Even though tuning the scaffold degradation and monitoring the release profile of RG-I was not in the scope of this study, it is warranted to be investigated in the future. This is because the release profile of RG-I can certainly influence the cellular activity and aids in regulating immunological responses further.

While the scientific evidence about anti-inflammatory properties of different origins of RG-I is limited and not uniform, the osteogenic properties have been described in several studies [13,14,15, 17, 18, 38]. Furthermore, most of these studies found that RG-I with a relatively higher amount of galactose stimulates osteoblasts to produce an extra-cellular matrix, followed by its mineralization and leading to bone formation. Bone regeneration is challenged in compromised patients, especially aged patients. Therefore, it is essential to know how ageing, alters inflammatory responses and regenerative processes. In this study, we further investigated the ability of RG-I to stimulate bone regeneration in a critical size bone defect in aged rats. Our results clearly showed superior osteogenic properties (upregulation of mRNA COL-1 and osteocalcin) in PA functionalized PLCA scaffolds compared to Control unfunctionalized scaffolds and autograft. Furthermore, the autograft group in our study stimulated high expressions of pro-inflammatory markers, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1α, which may amount to unpredicted resorption [8]. Indeed, our results revealed a 10-fold higher expression of RANKL on autograft, compared to PA functionalized scaffolds. These results are in line with clinical findings, showing a higher resorption rate of autogenous bone grafts compared to some slow degrading biomaterials [68]. Furthermore, the main challenge of autogenous bone grafting is limited availability and donor site morbidity [5]. In addition, elderly patients undergoing complex surgical procedures are at a higher risk of hospitalization due to complications related to bacterial infection [2, 3]. Therefore, there is a high demand for the development of an immunomodulating scaffold with osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties that will reduce the operating time and risk of complications.

The PLCA scaffold functionalized with PA has shown in this study to reduce the inflammatory state stimulated by bacterial LPS, which may contribute to the controlling of post-operative infection risks. Additional studies on multispecies biofilm conditions to assess further the immunomodulatory properties of these functionalized scaffolds are required, as well as longer time points on calvaria defects to investigate the quality of bone formed.

Conclusion

We have shown that PLCA scaffolds functionalized with plant-derived RG-I with relatively higher amount of galactose play a role in the modulation of inflammatory responses both in vitro and in vivo subcutaneously and promote the initiation of bone formation in a critical-sized bone defect of an aged rodent. Taken together, our study has addressed the increasing demand in bone tissue engineering for immunomodulatory 3D scaffolds that promote osteogenesis and modulate immune responses by utilizing bioactive factors.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

3D:

Three-dimensional

RG-I:

Rhamnogalacturonan-I

Gal:

Galactose

PLCA:

Poly(l-lactide-co-É›-caprolactone)

RG-I:

Rhamnogalacturonan-I

PA:

Potato RG-I dearabinated

PU:

Unmodified potato RG-I

AFM:

Atomic force microscopy

FITC:

Fluorescein isothiocyanate

PMN:

Polymorphonuclear neutrophils

PBMC:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

E. coli LPS:

Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide

Auto:

Autograft

TNF-α:

Tumour necrosis factor-alpha

IL-1ß:

Interleukin-1 beta

IL-1α:

Interleukin-1 alpha

IL-8:

Interleukin-8

IL-10:

Interleukin-10

Gal-1:

Galectin-1

Gal-3:

Galectin-3

TLR2:

Toll-like receptor 2

TLR4:

Toll-like receptor 4

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

TGF-ß1:

Transforming growth factor beta-1

CSF1R:

Colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor

B2M:

Beta-2-microglobulin

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

MIP-1α:

Macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha

RANTES:

Chemokine regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted

COL-Iα1:

Collagen, type I, alpha 1

RANKL:

Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand

References

  1. Haughton B, Stang J. Population risk factors and trends in health care and public policy. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(3):S35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2011.12.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dall TM, Gallo PD, Chakrabarti R, West T, Semilla AP, Storm MV. An aging population and growing disease burden will require a large and specialized health care workforce by 2025. Health affairs. 2013;32(11):2013–20. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Xia S, Zhang X, Zheng S, Khanabdali R, Kalionis B, Wu J, et al. An update on inflamm-aging: mechanisms, prevention, and treatment. J Immunol Res. 2016;2016:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8426874.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Josephson AM, Bradaschia-Correa V, Lee S, Leclerc K, Patel KS, Muinos Lopez E, et al. Age-related inflammation triggers skeletal stem/progenitor cell dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116(14):6995–7004. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810692116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gjerde C, Mustafa K, Hellem S, Rojewski M, Gjengedal H, Yassin MA, et al. Cell therapy induced regeneration of severely atrophied mandibular bone in a clinical trial. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0951-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amini AR et al. Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2012; 40(5).

  7. Terheyden H, Lang NP, Bierbaum S, Stadlinger B. Osseointegration–communication of cells. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(10):1127–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02327.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maruyama M, Rhee C, Utsunomiya T, Zhang N, Ueno M, Yao Z, et al. Modulation of the inflammatory response and bone healing. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Inngjerdingen KT, Patel TR, Chen X, Kenne L, Allen S, Morris GA, et al. Immunological and structural properties of a pectic polymer from Glinus oppositifolius. Glycobiology. 2007;17(12):1299–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwm088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2000;21(7):667–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gurzawska K, Svava R, Jørgensen NR, Gotfredsen K. Nanocoating of titanium implant surfaces with organic molecules. Polysaccharides including glycosaminoglycans. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2012;8(6):1012–24. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2012.1457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bussy C, Verhoef R, Haeger A, Morra M, Duval JL, Vigneron P, et al. Modulating in vitro bone cell and macrophage behavior by immobilized enzymatically tailored pectins. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;86(3):597–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morra M, Cassinelli C, Cascardo G, Nagel MD, Della Volpe C, Siboni S, et al. Effects on interfacial properties and cell adhesion of surface modification by pectic hairy regions. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5(6):2094–104. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049834q.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gurzawska K, Svava R, Syberg S, Yihua Y, Haugshøj KB, Damager I, et al. Effect of nanocoating with rhamnogalacturonan-I on surface properties and osteoblasts response. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100(3):654–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.33311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gurzawska K, Svava R, Yihua Y, Haugshøj KB, Dirscherl K, Levery SB, et al. Osteoblastic response to pectin nanocoating on titanium surfaces. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;43:117–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.06.028.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kokkonen H, Cassinelli C, Verhoef R, Morra M, Schols HA, Tuukkanen J. Differentiation of osteoblasts on pectin-coated titanium. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9(9):2369–76. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm800356b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kokkonen H, Verhoef R, Kauppinen K, Muhonen V, Jørgensen B, Damager I, et al. Affecting osteoblastic responses with in vivo engineered potato pectin fragments. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100(1):111–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.33240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Folkert J, Meresta A, Gaber T, Miksch K, Buttgereit F, Detert J, et al. Nanocoating with plant-derived pectins activates osteoblast response in vitro. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:239–49. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S99020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meresta A, Folkert J, Gaber T, Miksch K, Buttgereit F, Detert J, et al. Plant-derived pectin nanocoatings to prevent inflammatory cellular response of osteoblasts following Porphyromonas gingivalis infection. J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:433–45. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S113740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Popov S, et al. Antiinflammatory activity of the pectic polysaccharide from Comarum palustre. Fitoterapia. 2005;76(3-4):281–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2005.03.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Popov S, et al. Chemical characterization and anti-inflammatory effect of rauvolfian, a pectic polysaccharide of Rauvolfia callus. Biochem (Mosc). 2007;72(7):778–84. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297907070139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gallet Met al. Inhibition of LPS-induced proinflammatory responses of J774. 2 macrophages by immobilized enzymatically tailored pectins. Acta Biomater. 2009; 5(7):2618-2622.

  23. Furth ME, Atala A, van Dyke ME. Smart biomaterials design for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials. 2007;28(34):5068–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagel M-D, Verhoef R, Schols H, Morra M, Knox JP, Ceccone G, et al. Enzymatically-tailored pectins differentially influence the morphology, adhesion, cell cycle progression and survival of fibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2008;1780(7-8):995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.04.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. DÃ¥nmark S, Finne-Wistrand A, Albertsson AC, Patarroyo M, Mustafa K. Integrin-mediated adhesion of human mesenchymal stem cells to extracellular matrix proteins adsorbed to polymer surfaces. Biomed Mater. 2012;7(3):035011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/7/3/035011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pappalardo D, Mathisen T, Finne-Wistrand A. Biocompatibility of resorbable polymers: a historical perspective and framework for the future. Biomacromolecules. 2019;20(4):1465–77. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yassin MA, Mustafa K, Xing Z, Sun Y, Fasmer KE, Waag T, et al. A copolymer scaffold functionalized with nanodiamond particles enhances osteogenic metabolic activity and bone regeneration. Macromol Biosci. 2017;17(6):1600427. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201600427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Xing Z, Pedersen TO, Wu X, Xue Y, Sun Y, Finne-Wistrand A, et al. Biological effects of functionalizing copolymer scaffolds with nanodiamond particles. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19(15-16):1783–91. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yassin MA, Leknes KN, Sun Y, Lie SA, Finne-Wistrand A, Mustafa K. Surfactant tuning of hydrophilicity of porous degradable copolymer scaffolds promotes cellular proliferation and enhances bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104(8):2049–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35741.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Suliman S, Xing Z, Wu X, Xue Y, Pedersen TO, Sun Y, et al. Release and bioactivity of bone morphogenetic protein-2 are affected by scaffold binding techniques in vitro and in vivo. J Control Release. 2015;197:148–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.11.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Suliman S, Mustafa K, Krueger A, Steinmüller-Nethl D, Finne-Wistrand A, Osdal T, et al. Nanodiamond modified copolymer scaffolds affects tumour progression of early neoplastic oral keratinocytes. Biomaterials. 2016;95:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Suliman S, Sun Y, Pedersen TO, Xue Y, Nickel J, Waag T, et al. In vivo host response and degradation of copolymer scaffolds functionalized with nanodiamonds and bone morphogenetic protein 2. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(6):730–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Munir A et al. Efficacy of copolymer scaffolds delivering human demineralised dentine matrix for bone regeneration. J Tissue Eng .2019; 10:2041731419852703.

  34. Svava R, Gurzawska K, Yihau Y, Haugshøj KB, Dirscherl K, Levery SB, et al. The structurally effect of surface coated rhamnogalacturonan I on response of the osteoblast-like cell line SaOS-2. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(6):1961–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34868.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Matthews J, et al. Neutrophil hyper-responsiveness in periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2007;86(8):718–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sotoodehnejadnematalahi F, Staples KJ, Chrysanthou E, Pearson H, Ziegler-Heitbrock L, Burke B. Mechanisms of hypoxic up-regulation of versican gene expression in macrophages. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0125799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mieszkowska A, Folkert J, Gaber T, Miksch K, Gurzawska K. Pectin nanocoating reduces proinflammatory fibroblast response to bacteria. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105(12):3475–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Prado SB, et al. Pectin interaction with immune receptors is modulated by ripening process in papayas. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58311-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ishisono K, Yabe T, Kitaguchi K. Citrus pectin attenuates endotoxin shock via suppression of Toll-like receptor signaling in Peyer’s patch myeloid cells. J Nutr Biochem. 2017;50:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2017.07.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gao X, Zhi Y, Sun L, Peng X, Zhang T, Xue H, et al. The inhibitory effects of a rhamnogalacturonan Ι (RG-I) domain from ginseng pectin on galectin-3 and its structure-activity relationship. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288(47):33953–65. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.482315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen C, Duckworth CA, Zhao Q, Pritchard DM, Rhodes JM, Yu LG. Increased circulation of galectin-3 in cancer induces secretion of metastasis-promoting cytokines from blood vascular endothelium. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013;19(7):1693–704. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2940.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Díaz-Alvarez L, Ortega E. The many roles of galectin-3, a multifaceted molecule, in innate immune responses against pathogens. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9247574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Miller MC, Zheng Y, Zhou Y, Tai G, Mayo KH. Galectin-3 binds selectively to the terminal, non-reducing end of β (1→ 4)-galactans, with overall affinity increasing with chain length. Glycobiology. 2019;29(1):74–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwy085.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu Y, Yu S, Chai Y, Zhang Q, Yang H, Zhu Q. Lipopolysaccharide-induced gene expression of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 and interleukin-1β in roughskin sculpin (Trachidermus fasciatus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012;33(4):690–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2012.05.035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Burguillos MA, Svensson M, Schulte T, Boza-Serrano A, Garcia-Quintanilla A, Kavanagh E, et al. Microglia-secreted galectin-3 acts as a toll-like receptor 4 ligand and contributes to microglial activation. Cell Rep. 2015;10(9):1626–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fermino ML, Polli CD, Toledo KA, Liu FT, Hsu DK, Roque-Barreira MC, et al. LPS-induced galectin-3 oligomerization results in enhancement of neutrophil activation. PloS one. 2011;6(10):e26004. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Kuwabara I, et al. Galectin-3 promotes adhesion of human neutrophils to laminin. J. Immunol. 1996;156(10):3939–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sano H, Hsu DK, Yu L, Apgar JR, Kuwabara I, Yamanaka T, et al. Human galectin-3 is a novel chemoattractant for monocytes and macrophages. J. Immunol. 2000;165(4):2156–64. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.165.4.2156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Filer A, Bik M, Parsonage GN, Fitton J, Trebilcock E, Howlett K, et al. Galectin 3 induces a distinctive pattern of cytokine and chemokine production in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts via selective signaling pathways. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(6):1604–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24574.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Matter CM, Handschin C. RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted), inflammation, obesity, and the metabolic syndrome. Circulation. 2007;115(8):946–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. de Jonge LT, Leeuwenburgh SCG, Wolke JGC, Jansen JA. Organic–inorganic surface modifications for titanium implant surfaces. Pharm Res. 2008;25(10):2357–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-008-9617-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Morra M. Biochemical modification of titanium surfaces: peptides and ECM proteins. Eur Cell Mater. 2006;12(1):15. https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v012a01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Munarin F, Guerreiro SG, Grellier MA, Tanzi MC, Barbosa MA, Petrini P, et al. Pectin-based injectable biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12(3):568–77. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm101110x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Liang WG, Triandafillou CG, Huang TY, Zulueta MML, Banerjee S, Dinner AR, et al. Structural basis for oligomerization and glycosaminoglycan binding of CCL5 and CCL3. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(18):5000–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523981113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Bhattacharya P, Thiruppathi M, Elshabrawy HA, Alharshawi K, Kumar P, Prabhakar BS. GM-CSF: an immune modulatory cytokine that can suppress autoimmunity. Cytokine. 2015;75(2):261–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2015.05.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Slavov E, Miteva L, Prakova G, Gidikova P, Stanilova S. Correlation between TNF-alpha and IL-12p40-containing cytokines in silicosis. Toxicol Ind Health. 2010;26(8):479–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233710373082.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lisignoli G, Piacentini A, Cristino S, Grassi F, Cavallo C, Cattini L, et al. CCL20 chemokine induces both osteoblast proliferation and osteoclast differentiation: Increased levels of CCL20 are expressed in subchondral bone tissue of rheumatoid arthritis patients. J Cell Physiol. 2007;210(3):798–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.20905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Jones K. Fibrotic response to biomaterials and all associated sequence of fibrosis. In: Host response to biomaterials. Elsevier; 2015: 189-237, Fibrotic Response to Biomaterials and all Associated Sequence of Fibrosis.

  60. O’brien FJ. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Today. 2011;14(3):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Dånmark S, Finne-Wistrand A, Schander K, Hakkarainen M, Arvidson K, Mustafa K, et al. In vitro and in vivo degradation profile of aliphatic polyesters subjected to electron beam sterilization. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(5):2035–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Gurzawska K, Dirscherl K, Yihua Y, Byg I, Jørgensen B, Svava R, et al. Characterization of pectin nanocoatings at polystyrene and titanium surfaces. JSEMAT. 2013;3(04):20–8. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsemat.2013.34A1003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Karageorgiou V, et al. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005;26(27):5474–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Dånmark S, Finne-Wistrand A, Wendel M, Arvidson K, Albertsson AC, Mustafa K. Osteogenic differentiation by rat bone marrow stromal cells on customized biodegradable polymer scaffolds. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2010;25(2):207–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883911509358812.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Odelius K, Plikk P, Albertsson AC Elastomeric hydrolyzable porous scaffolds: copolymers of aliphatic polyesters and a polyether−ester. Biomacromolecules; 2005: 6(5):2718-2725, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bm050190b.

  66. Sharma S, Sapkota D, Xue Y, Rajthala S, Yassin MA, Finne-Wistrand A, et al. Delivery of VEGFA in bone marrow stromal cells seeded in copolymer scaffold enhances angiogenesis, but is inadequate for osteogenesis as compared with the dual delivery of VEGFA and BMP2 in a subcutaneous mouse model. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018;9(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0778-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Xue Y, Dånmark S, Xing Z, Arvidson K, Albertsson AC, Hellem S, et al. Growth and differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells on biodegradable polymer scaffolds: an in vitro study. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;95(4):1244–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32945.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Rolvien T et al. Cellular mechanisms responsible for success and failure of bone substitute materials. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2018: 19(10):2893.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Prof. Peter Ulvskov (University of Copenhagen) for discussions during the initiation of the project and Dr. Spiro Comis for the English language revision of the manuscript.

Funding

The research leading to these results was funded by the University of Bergen and the University of Birmingham. This study received support from Trond Mohn Foundation (S.S) (TMS2021STG03), the IADR Osteology Foundation (K.G.C), the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (RMA15-0010) (A.F.W), the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science (K.D), and The Research Council of Norway (BEHANDLING/273551) (K.M).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Kamal Mustafa and Katarzyna Gurzawska-Comis contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre of Translational Oral Research (TOR), Department of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Ã…rstadveien 19, 5009, Bergen, Norway

    Salwa Suliman, Neha Rana, Samih Mohamed-Ahmed & Kamal Mustafa

  2. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, 31-007, Krakow, Poland

    Anna Mieszkowska & Justyna Folkert

  3. Department of Fibre and Polymer Technology, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

    Tiziana Fuoco & Anna Finne-Wistrand

  4. Dansk Fundamental Metrologi A/S, Kogle Allé 5, 2970, Hørsholm, Denmark

    Kai Dirscherl

  5. Department of Plant and Environment Sciences, Section for Plant Glyco Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Bodil Jørgensen

  6. Department of Oral Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical & Dental Science, The University of Birmingham, 5 Mill Pool Way, Birmingham, B5 7EG, UK

    Katarzyna Gurzawska-Comis

  7. Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Dental Hospital, Oral Surgery Department, Birmingham, UK

    Katarzyna Gurzawska-Comis

Authors
  1. Salwa Suliman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Mieszkowska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Justyna Folkert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Neha Rana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Samih Mohamed-Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tiziana Fuoco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Anna Finne-Wistrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kai Dirscherl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bodil Jørgensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kamal Mustafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Katarzyna Gurzawska-Comis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SS and KGC: Conceptualized the idea, performed part of the in vitro and in vivo experiments, analysed and interpreted all data, and drafted the manuscript. AM: contributed to in vitro experiments, sample analysis, and histological quantification. JF and NR: contributed to in vivo sample analysis. SMA: contributed to animal procedures. TF, AFW: fabricated PLCA scaffolds. KD: performed AFM and confocal experiments. BJ: isolated and produced rhamnogalacturonan-I. KM: Contributed to idea conceptualization and methodology. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Salwa Suliman or Katarzyna Gurzawska-Comis.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all volunteer blood donors and the study was approved by the local research ethics committee of the Dental School, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK (approval number 14/SW/1148). Animal experiments were approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Authority and conducted in strict accordance with the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrates used for Scientific Purposes (FOTS nos. 7894 and 12936).

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suliman, S., Mieszkowska, A., Folkert, J. et al. Immune-instructive copolymer scaffolds using plant-derived nanoparticles to promote bone regeneration. Inflamm Regener 42, 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232-022-00196-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232-022-00196-9

Keywords

Inflammation and Regeneration

ISSN: 1880-8190

Contact us