Skip to main content

Toward the realization of cardiac regenerative medicine using pluripotent stem cells


Heart transplantation (HT) is the only radical treatment available for patients with end-stage heart failure that is refractory to optimal medical treatment and device therapies. However, HT as a therapeutic option is limited by marked donor shortage. To overcome this difficulty, regenerative medicine using human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) has drawn increasing attention as an alternative to HT.

Several issues including the preparation of clinical-grade hiPSCs, methods for large-scale culture and production of hiPSCs and cardiomyocytes, prevention of tumorigenesis secondary to contamination of undifferentiated stem cells and non-cardiomyocytes, and establishment of an effective transplantation strategy need to be addressed to fulfill this unmet medical need. The ongoing rapid technological advances in hiPSC research have been directed toward the clinical application of this technology, and currently, most issues have been satisfactorily addressed. Cell therapy using hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes is expected to serve as an integral component of realistic medicine in the near future and is being potentially viewed as a treatment that would revolutionize the management of patients with severe heart failure.


In 2006, Yamanaka et al. introduced the genes Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (referred to as Yamanaka factors) into somatic cells in mice and successfully developed induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) [1], which showed properties similar to those of embryonic stem cells (ESCs). In 2007, they developed human-iPSCs (hiPSCs) [2]. It is possible to elucidate the pathophysiology of several unknown genetic diseases using patient-derived hiPSCs, and these are also useful for novel drug screening. Thus, the emergence of hiPSCs is a promising therapeutic approach in patients with diseases that were previously considered incurable. Evaluation of the responsiveness of patient-derived hiPSCs to drugs can determine the role of these cells in personalized medicine. Moreover, hiPSCs are drawing increasing attention as a revolutionary approach toward the rapid realization of regenerative medicine. This unique technology overcomes the challenges affecting regenerative medicine research such as ethical issues and immune rejection reactions, which serve as significant drawbacks of ESCs derived from the inner cell mass that forms a part of the embryo (blastocyst stage).

End-stage heart failure is a significant contributor to the cardiovascular disease burden in adults. Unfortunately, this condition is refractory to medical treatment and device therapies. Heart transplantation (HT) is the only radical treatment available in the present era. However, a marked shortage of donor hearts limits the availability of HT as a therapeutic option, particularly in Japan. Currently, the number of patients undergoing HT is < 100, and the waiting period to register for transplantation is > 3 years (The Registry Report of Heart Transplantation in Japan 2016). Given this scenario, hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes are considered an ideal cell source in patients requiring HT for severe heart failure [3].

In this review, we have discussed the current scenario with regard to the utility of hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes in cardiac regenerative medicine, as well as their clinical application (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Strategy of cardiac regenerative therapy using human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. iPSC, induced pluripotent stem cell

Main text

Protocols for cardiac differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells

Several researchers have reported cardiac differentiation of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) to artificially generate human cardiomyocytes (Table 1). Regarding the induction of cardiomyocytes from human-PSCs (hPSCs), these can be induced to differentiate into cardiomyocytes at different sites within the heart, such as the atria, ventricles, and other such structures. Reportedly, these cells show the same characteristic electrical activity as demonstrated by human cardiomyocytes [19]. Protocols for the differentiation of hiPSCs into cardiomyocytes have been established based on the development and differentiation of the heart [18]. Currently, three- and two-dimensional culture methods are available for cardiac differentiation. The three-dimensional culture method generates large quantities of cardiomyocytes by suspension culture using a bioreactor or spinner flask [20]. However, this technology is expensive because it requires the use of recombinant proteins, such as bone morphogenetic proteins (which belong to the transforming growth factor-β superfamily), to induce differentiation into the mesoderm. In contrast, 2-dimensional culture involves differentiation methods that use low-molecular-weight compounds such as CHIR99021 (an inhibitor of glycogen synthase kinase 3β) and inhibitors of Wnt, such as IWR-1 and IWP-2. This technology is a cost-effective option for differentiation into cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, two-dimensional culture using multilayer culture plates with active gas ventilation has enabled the generation of large quantities of cardiomyocytes that are required for transplantation [17]. No method can achieve 100% efficiency in cardiomyocyte differentiation, and variations are observed among hiPSC lines and passage numbers; therefore, optimization of the cell differentiation protocol is necessary using specific quantities of pre-optimized reagents to support differentiation into the desired cell types. Development of an efficient method to trigger cardiac differentiation is essential for the large-scale mechanized production of these cells for the realization of transplantation therapy using hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Further research is warranted to develop simpler and more efficient and stable methods.

Table 1 Cardiac differentiation protocols

Cardiomyocyte purification system

The currently available cardiomyocyte differentiation methods are highly efficient in producing cardiomyocytes. However, if all cells do not differentiate into cardiomyocytes (if the rate of differentiation is not 100%), there exists an increased risk of tumorigenesis secondary to contamination with non-cardiomyocytes and undifferentiated cells at the time of transplantation. Unfortunately, this factor is a significant barrier to the realization of cardiac regenerative medicine. Therefore, safe transplantation without risk of tumorigenesis necessitates the removal of undifferentiated stem cells and non-cardiomyocytes. Various methods have been reported for the removal of undifferentiated stem cells [21,22,23] to prevent teratoma formation. Among these studies, we identified glypican-3 (GPC3), a known carcinoembryonic antigen, as a pluripotent state-specific immunogenic antigen. Moreover, we also confirmed that GPC3-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) selectively removed undifferentiated PSCs from hiPSC-derivatives in vitro and inhibited tumor formation in vivo [24]. However, contaminating non-cardiomyocytes undergoing differentiation may cause tumorigenesis of non-cardiomyocytes. Therefore, we evaluated the applicability of a method for purification of cardiomyocytes alone as a safer transplantation method. Thus, we created a metabolic environment that was conducive to the survival of cardiomyocytes but not undifferentiated stem cells and non-cardiomyocytes. We developed a cardiomyocyte purification medium containing glucose-free lactic acid, which enabled purification of only cardiomyocytes based on the difference in metabolism [25]. Following intensive research focusing on amino acid metabolism, it is known that glutamine is essential for the survival of hiPSCs and that the use of glucose and glutamine-free lactic acid-supplemented medium improves the efficiency of the cardiomyocyte purification method. This knowledge was useful in removing undifferentiated stem cells more efficiently for the purification of cardiomyocytes in a clinical setting [26]. Thus, only cardiomyocytes can be selected in large quantities in a cost-effective manner without using genetic modification technology or fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Moreover, tumor formation (teratomas) was not observed even after transplantation of these cells into immunodeficient mice. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that this metabolic selection method for differentiated cardiomyocytes can ensure safe regenerative cardiomyocyte transplantation.

Strategy for the transplantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes

A previous study investigating regenerative therapy with cardiomyocyte transplantation has reported that iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes prepared from skin fibroblasts in patients with heart failure were transplanted into rat hearts and were successfully engrafted [27]. Another study showed that human-ESC (hESC)-derived myocardium transplanted in a guinea pig myocardial infarction model led to improved cardiac function and decrease of ventricular arrhythmias after transplantation [28]. These results indicate the potential utility and feasibility of ESC or iPSC-derived cardiomyocyte transplantation therapy for myocardial regeneration (Table 2). To date, heart cell transplantation is performed by direct injection of the cell suspension into the heart via a syringe, although there is room for improvement in the cell survival rate. Most transplanted cells were observed to be necrotic or an efflux [40]. This observation can be attributed to the fact that the transplanted cardiomyocytes flow out of the myocardium secondary to the beating of the heart, resulting in a low-survival rate. Notably, cell sheet technology is a method of transplantation that involves stacking of multilayered cardiomyocyte sheets to form a scaffold that is transplanted onto the epicardium [41]. However, with this method, the transplanted myocardium may not be electrophysiologically synchronized with the recipient’s heart because the epicardium is an electrically insulating tissue. We produced cardiac spheroids with purified cardiomyocytes (approximately 200 μm in diameter) and observed that transplantation of these significantly improved the engraftment rate [29, 42]. Cardiomyocyte aggregates do not flow out owing to increased cell adhesion and secretion of cell growth factor and increased cell mass size. Additionally, a recent study investigating the effectiveness of hiPSC-derived cardiomyocyte transplantation into a large animal myocardial infarction model such as a pig and monkey model has been reported as a preclinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the clinical application of this approach [30,31,32,33], and it is expected that human studies would soon be reported.

Table 2 Transplantation protocols

Adverse effects of cell transplantation

Arrhythmias and immune response-mediated transplant rejection are serious adverse events associated with cardiomyocyte transplantation (Fig. 2). A previous study has reported the development of arrhythmias in patients with severe heart failure who received an injection of skeletal myoblasts [43]. Connexin 43 and N-cadherin, which are essential to establish electrophysiological connections between cardiomyocytes, are not expressed in myoblasts, and automatism associated with myoblasts can precipitate arrhythmias [44]. Previous studies have shown that cardiomyocytes can establish connections with the host heart, and hESC-derived cardiomyocytes can establish electrical connections with neonatal rat cardiomyocytes and become synchronized to beat in vitro [45]. Additionally, it has been shown that transplanted cardiomyocytes demonstrated electrical coupling with the host heart after hESC-derived cardiomyocytes were engrafted to guinea pig hearts [28]. However, several studies have also reported the development of ventricular arrhythmia within the first 2 weeks to 1 month after transplantation into a recipient’s heart, which however disappeared a month after cell transplantation [31, 46]. These data suggest that the arrhythmogenicity of hPSC-derived cardiomyocytes in vivo remains controversial and that it is necessary to closely monitor the heart for arrhythmias after cell transplantation in humans.

Fig. 2

Clinical benefits and risks of cardiac regenerative therapy

Autologous transplantation of iPSCs can realize the goal of cell transplantation without the institution of immunosuppressive therapy. In cases of allogeneic transplantation of iPSCs, controlling the immune response in a recipient is essential for successful engraftment of transplanted cardiomyocytes. Maintaining an iPSC bank is a useful clinical strategy to obtain human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched iPSCs, which will obviate the need for immunosuppressant administration in the recipient [47]. However, it should be noted that non-HLA-matched allogeneic cell transplantation requires the administration of a complete immunosuppressive regimen. The immunosuppressive regimen is essentially the same as that prescribed in patients undergoing HT, because the optimal immunosuppressive regimen for cardiac cell transplantation remains unknown. Notably, immunosuppressive therapies can cause adverse effects, such as severe infection and malignancy.


The realization of cardiac regenerative medicine using hiPSCs requires the efficient and cost-effective large-scale production of cardiomyocytes. Avoiding contamination with residual undifferentiated stem cells and non-cardiomyocytes is essential and this is the biggest safety challenge in this field. Fortunately, technological advances have facilitated effective strategies for the resolution of these issues. Several preclinical studies performed in large animals (guinea pig and monkey) are ongoing, and much progress has been reported in this realm. It is expected that following complete verification of safety and efficacy, cardiac regenerative medicine using hiPSCs will show wide clinical applicability in humans.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Bone morphogenetic proteins


Embryonic stem cell




Induced pluripotent stem cell


Pluripotent stem cell


  1. 1.

    Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yuasa S, Fukuda K. Recent advances in cardiovascular regenerative medicine: the induced pluripotent stem cell era. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2008;6(6):803–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kehat I, Kenyagin-Karsenti D, Snir M, Segev H, Amit M, Gepstein A, et al. Human embryonic stem cells can differentiate into myocytes with structural and functional properties of cardiomyocytes. J Clin Invest. 2001;108(3):407–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Laflamme MA, Chen KY, Naumova AV, Muskheli V, Fugate JA, Dupras SK, et al. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nature Biotechnol. 2007;25(9):1015–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yang L, Soonpaa MH, Adler ED, Roepke TK, Kattman SJ, Kennedy M, et al. Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR+ embryonic-stem-cell-derived population. Nature. 2008;453(7194):524–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tran TH, Wang X, Browne C, Zhang Y, Schinke M, Izumo S, et al. Wnt3a-induced mesoderm formation and cardiomyogenesis in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27(8):1869–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Elliott DA, Braam SR, Koutsis K, Ng ES, Jenny R, Lagerqvist EL, et al. NKX2-5(eGFP/w) hESCs for isolation of human cardiac progenitors and cardiomyocytes. Nature Methods. 2011;8(12):1037–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kattman SJ, Witty AD, Gagliardi M, Dubois NC, Niapour M, Hotta A, et al. Stage-specific optimization of activin/nodal and BMP signaling promotes cardiac differentiation of mouse and human pluripotent stem cell lines. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8(2):228–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zhang Q, Jiang J, Han P, Yuan Q, Zhang J, Zhang X, et al. Direct differentiation of atrial and ventricular myocytes from human embryonic stem cells by alternating retinoid signals. Cell Res. 2011;21(4):579–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Willems E, Spiering S, Davidovics H, Lanier M, Xia Z, Dawson M, et al. Small-molecule inhibitors of the Wnt pathway potently promote cardiomyocytes from human embryonic stem cell-derived mesoderm. Circ Res. 2011;109(4):360–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang J, Klos M, Wilson GF, Herman AM, Lian X, Raval KK, et al. Extracellular matrix promotes highly efficient cardiac differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells: the matrix sandwich method. Circ Res. 2012;111(9):1125–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lian X, Zhang J, Azarin SM, Zhu K, Hazeltine LB, Bao X, et al. Directed cardiomyocyte differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells by modulating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling under fully defined conditions. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(1):162–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Burridge PW, Matsa E, Shukla P, Lin ZC, Churko JM, Ebert AD, et al. Chemically defined generation of human cardiomyocytes. Nat Methods. 2014;11(8):855–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Devalla HD, Schwach V, Ford JW, Milnes JT, El-Haou S, Jackson C, et al. Atrial-like cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells are a robust preclinical model for assessing atrial-selective pharmacology. EMBO Mol Med. 2015;7(4):394–410.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Protze SI, Liu J, Nussinovitch U, Ohana L, Backx PH, Gepstein L, et al. Sinoatrial node cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent cells function as a biological pacemaker. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(1):56–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tohyama S, Fujita J, Fujita C, Yamaguchi M, Kanaami S, Ohno R, et al. Efficient Large-Scale 2D Culture System for Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Differentiated Cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9(5):1406–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Fujita J, Tohyama S, Kishino Y, Okada M, Morita Y. Concise Review: Genetic and epigenetic regulation of cardiac differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells. 2019.

  19. 19.

    Zhang J, Wilson GF, Soerens AG, Koonce CH, Yu J, Palecek SP, et al. Functional cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation research. 2009;104(4):e30–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hemmi N, Tohyama S, Nakajima K, Kanazawa H, Suzuki T, Hattori F, et al. A massive suspension culture system with metabolic purification for human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014;3(12):1473–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kuang Y, Miki K, Parr CJC, Hayashi K, Takei I, Li J, et al. Efficient, Selective Removal of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells via Ecto-Alkaline Phosphatase-Mediated Aggregation of Synthetic Peptides. Cell Chem Biol. 2017;24(6):685–94 e4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tateno H, Onuma Y, Ito Y, Minoshima F, Saito S, Shimizu M, et al. Elimination of tumorigenic human pluripotent stem cells by a recombinant lectin-toxin fusion protein. Stem Cell Rep. 2015;4(5):811–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Parr CJ, Katayama S, Miki K, Kuang Y, Yoshida Y, Morizane A, et al. MicroRNA-302 switch to identify and eliminate undifferentiated human pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32532.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Okada M, Tada Y, Seki T, Tohyama S, Fujita J, Suzuki T, et al. Selective elimination of undifferentiated human pluripotent stem cells using pluripotent state-specific immunogenic antigen Glypican-3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;511(3):711–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tohyama S, Hattori F, Sano M, Hishiki T, Nagahata Y, Matsuura T, et al. Distinct metabolic flow enables large-scale purification of mouse and human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12(1):127–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tohyama S, Fujita J, Hishiki T, Matsuura T, Hattori F, Ohno R, et al. Glutamine Oxidation Is Indispensable for Survival of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell Metabol. 2016;23(4):663–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zwi-Dantsis L, Huber I, Habib M, Winterstern A, Gepstein A, Arbel G, et al. Derivation and cardiomyocyte differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells from heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(21):1575–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shiba Y, Fernandes S, Zhu WZ, Filice D, Muskheli V, Kim J, et al. Human ES-cell-derived cardiomyocytes electrically couple and suppress arrhythmias in injured hearts. Nature. 2012;489(7415):322–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hattori F, Chen H, Yamashita H, Tohyama S, Satoh YS, Yuasa S, et al. Nongenetic method for purifying stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Nature Methods. 2010;7(1):61–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ye L, Chang YH, Xiong Q, Zhang P, Zhang L, Somasundaram P, et al. Cardiac repair in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction with human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiovascular cells. Cell stem cell. 2014;15(6):750–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chong JJ, Yang X, Don CW, Minami E, Liu YW, Weyers JJ, et al. Human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerate non-human primate hearts. Nature. 2014;510(7504):273–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Shiba Y, Gomibuchi T, Seto T, Wada Y, Ichimura H, Tanaka Y, et al. Allogeneic transplantation of iPS cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerates primate hearts. Nature. 2016;538(7625):388–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Liu YW, Chen B, Yang X, Fugate JA, Kalucki FA, Futakuchi-Tsuchida A, et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes restore function in infarcted hearts of non-human primates. Nature biotechnology. 2018;36(7):597–605.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kimura T, Miyoshi S, Okamoto K, Fukumoto K, Tanimoto K, Soejima K, et al. The effectiveness of rigid pericardial endoscopy for minimally invasive minor surgeries: cell transplantation, epicardial pacemaker lead implantation, and epicardial ablation. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;7:117.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Masumoto H, Matsuo T, Yamamizu K, Uosaki H, Narazaki G, Katayama S, et al. Pluripotent stem cell-engineered cell sheets reassembled with defined cardiovascular populations ameliorate reduction in infarct heart function through cardiomyocyte-mediated neovascularization. Stem Cells. 2012;30(6):1196–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Suzuki R, Hattori F, Itabashi Y, Yoshioka M, Yuasa S, Manabe-Kawaguchi H, et al. Omentopexy enhances graft function in myocardial cell sheet transplantation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;387(2):353–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kashiyama N, Miyagawa S, Fukushima S, Kawamura T, Kawamura A, Yoshida S, et al. MHC-mismatched Allotransplantation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Cardiomyocyte Sheets to Improve Cardiac Function in a Primate Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Model. Transplantation. 2019;103(8):1582–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ott HC, Matthiesen TS, Goh SK, Black LD, Kren SM, Netoff TI, et al. Perfusion-decellularized matrix: using nature’s platform to engineer a bioartificial heart. Nat Med. 2008;14(2):213–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lu TY, Lin B, Kim J, Sullivan M, Tobita K, Salama G, et al. Repopulation of decellularized mouse heart with human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiovascular progenitor cells. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2307.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hattan N, Kawaguchi H, Ando K, Kuwabara E, Fujita J, Murata M, et al. Purified cardiomyocytes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells produce stable intracardiac grafts in mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;65(2):334–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fujita J, Itabashi Y, Seki T, Tohyama S, Tamura Y, Sano M, et al. Myocardial cell sheet therapy and cardiac function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012;303(10):H1169–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tabei R, Kawaguchi S, Kanazawa H, Tohyama S, Hirano A, Handa N, et al. Development of a transplant injection device for optimal distribution and retention of human induced pluripotent stem cellderived cardiomyocytes. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38(2):203–14.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Menasche P, Alfieri O, Janssens S, McKenna W, Reichenspurner H, Trinquart L, et al. The Myoblast Autologous Grafting in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (MAGIC) trial: first randomized placebo-controlled study of myoblast transplantation. Circulation. 2008;117(9):1189–200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Itabashi Y, Miyoshi S, Yuasa S, Fujita J, Shimizu T, Okano T, et al. Analysis of the electrophysiological properties and arrhythmias in directly contacted skeletal and cardiac muscle cell sheets. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;67(3):561–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Thompson SA, Burridge PW, Lipke EA, Shamblott M, Zambidis ET, Tung L. Engraftment of human embryonic stem cell derived cardiomyocytes improves conduction in an arrhythmogenic in vitro model. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;53(1):15–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Romagnuolo R, Masoudpour H, Porta-Sanchez A, Qiang B, Barry J, Laskary A, et al. Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes Regenerate the Infarcted Pig Heart but Induce Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias. Stem Cell Rep. 2019;12(5):967–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Morizane A, Doi D, Kikuchi T, Okita K, Hotta A, Kawasaki T, et al. Direct comparison of autologous and allogeneic transplantation of iPSC-derived neural cells in the brain of a non-human primate. Stem Cell Rep. 2013;1(4):283–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This work was supported by the Highway Program for Realization of Regenerative Medicine from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (to KF, no. 19bk0104062h0003), a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (to JF, no. 19H03660, to ST., no. 17H05067), Projects for Technological Development, Research Center Network for Realization of Regenerative Medicine by Japan, the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (to ST, no. 19bm0404023h0002), and JSPS KAKENHI (to ST, no. 17H05067).

Author information




YK, ST, MO, STanosaki, SS, and FJ participated in drafting of the manuscript. KF reviewed the manuscript. All coauthors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Fujita.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

JF, ST, and KF own equity in Heartseed, Inc. KF is the CEO of Heartseed, Inc. and receives a salary from Heartseed, Inc. YK, MO, STanosaki, and SS have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kishino, Y., Fujita, J., Tohyama, S. et al. Toward the realization of cardiac regenerative medicine using pluripotent stem cells. Inflamm Regener 40, 1 (2020).

Download citation


  • Regenerative medicine
  • Induced pluripotent stem cell
  • Cardiomyocyte