Skip to main content


Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in non-neoplastic inflamed organs



Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a highly heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells with immunosuppressive function. Although their function in tumor-bearing conditions is well studied, less is known about the role of MDSCs in various organs under non-neoplastic inflammatory conditions.

Main body

MDSCs are divided into two subpopulations, G-MDSCs and M-MDSCs, and their distribution varies between organs. MDSCs negatively control inflammation in inflamed organs such as the lungs, joints, liver, kidneys, intestines, central nervous system (CNS), and eyes by suppressing T cells and myeloid cells. MDSCs also regulate fibrosis in the lungs, liver, and kidneys and help repair CNS injuries. MDSCs in organs are plastic and can differentiate into osteoclasts and tolerogenic dendritic cells according to the microenvironment under non-neoplastic inflammatory conditions.


This article summarizes recent findings about MDSCs under inflammatory conditions, especially with respect to their function and differentiation in specific organs.


Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which are best known for their role in tumor-bearing conditions, also mediate the resolution of inflammatory diseases. MDSCs can play conflicting roles in inflammation because the phenotypes and functions of this plastic, highly heterogeneous population depend largely on the local microenvironment. We here discuss the role of MDSCs under non-neoplastic inflammatory conditions, particularly in individual organs.

Main text

What are MDSCs?

MDSCs are a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells with immunosuppressive function. MDSCs were initially described in 1987 in a mouse model of lung cancer [1]. More recently, roles for MDSCs have been implicated in non-neoplastic inflammatory conditions such as infection, allergy, and autoimmune diseases [2, 3]. The major populations of bone marrow-derived myeloid cells are neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs), which are differentiated from hematopoietic progenitor cells via granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (GMPs). MDSCs are also differentiated from the common progenitors especially under pathogenic conditions [4]. Strong but short activation signals coming from acute infection or trauma induce classic myeloid cell activation, e.g., neutrophil, monocyte/macrophage, and DC activation. On the other hand, weak but chronic activation signals from malignancies, chronic infections, and inflammatory diseases favor the development of MDSC [4].

MDSCs are classified as granulocytic (G)-MDSCs or monocytic (M)-MDSCs. G-MDSCs are morphologically similar to neutrophils, while M-MDSCs are morphologically similar to monocytes. These subtypes are distinguished from neutrophils or monocytes by their morphology, surface phenotype, and function (Table 1). In mice, MDSCs are phenotypically defined as CD11b+Gr1+ cells, which are further classified into G-MDSCs as CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6Clow cells and M-MDSCs as CD11b+Ly6GLy6Chi cells [5]. In humans, markers for the entire MDSC population have not been clearly determined. Among peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), the equivalent to G-MDSCs is defined as CD11b+CD14CD15+ (or CD66b+) cells, and that to M-MDSCs as CD11b+CD14+HLA-DR−/lowCD15 cells [6]. As it is difficult to phenotypically distinguish G-MDSCs from neutrophils, or M-MDSCs from monocytes, it is important to prove whether or not these cells have suppressive function. While G-MDSCs and M-MDSCs are differentiated from common progenitors, e.g., GMPs [4], only immature neutrophils and monocytes can be converted to G-MDSCs and M-MDSCs, respectively [7].

Table 1 Comparisons of morphology, phenotype, and function between myeloid-derived cells

Macrophages are also known to be a highly heterogeneous population and M1/M2 subsets of macrophages are widely accepted [8]. Macrophages are differentiated from GMPs via monocyte-DC precursors and Ly6Chi monocytes [9]. Although M2 macrophages and M-MDSCs have a common origin and work as anti-inflammatory cells, these cells differ in several respects. For example, M-MDSCs express lower levels of MHC-II than M2 macrophages do, indicating that M-MDSCs are more immature populations. In addition, M-MDSCs, but not M2 macrophages, produce inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), whereas arginase-I (Arg-I) is produced in both cell types [10].

MDSCs are thought to suppress immune function by depleting lymphocytes’ nutrients, generating oxidative stress, and inducing regulatory T cells (Tregs) [11]. Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT), such as STAT1 and STAT3, is involved in regulating MDSC function. IFN-γ and interleukin (IL)-1β can trigger STAT1 signaling, leading to high levels of iNOS and Arg-I [12]. The resulting l-arginine depletion and nitric oxide (NO) production suppresses T cells. A lack of l-arginine decreases ζ-chain expression in the T cell receptor complex and arrests the proliferation of antigen-activated T cells [13]. On the other hand, NO production abolishes T cell function by inhibiting MHC-II expression and inducing T cell apoptosis [14]. Although both MDSC subsets can increase Arg-I levels, M-MDSCs produce higher levels of NO than do G-MDSCs [15]. T cell function is also regulated by modulating the CD3 ζ-chain expression, which is controlled by reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [16]. ROS are secreted primarily by G-MDSCs, and this secretion is upregulated by increased STAT-3 activation by IL-6, IL-10, and GM-CSF [11]. M-MDSCs, but not G-MDSCs, can promote Treg induction from purified CD4+ T cells [17], and Tregs suppress the activation and expansion of autoreactive T cells [18].

MDSC function in inflamed organs

This section describes the latest studies concerning the roles of MDSCs in individual organs, in both humans and mouse disease model systems (Table 2).

Table 2 The roles of MDSCs in individual organs


Although the lungs were long considered to be sterile, they are constantly exposed to microbiota through inhalation or subclinical microaspiration. Far from being sterile, the lungs harbor an abundance of diverse interacting microbiota that regulate lung immunity and homeostasis [19]. In the healthy lung, two macrophage populations work to maintain lung homeostasis: alveolar macrophages and interstitial macrophages. A third population of monocyte-derived macrophages may be recruited during inflammatory responses [20]. MDSCs are critical for negatively regulating immune responses in inflammatory lung diseases.

Arora et al. and Deshane et al. demonstrated that MDSCs suppress the Th2-dominant allergic inflammation in a murine model of asthma [21, 22]. CD11b+Gr1intF4/80+MDSC-like cells accumulate in the lung and suppress the lung DC-mediated reactivation of primed Th2 cells, which is mediated by IL-10 and Arg-1 [21]. The chemokine CCL2 recruits MDSCs into lung tissues in airway inflammation [23]. In humans, high numbers of CD11b+CD14+CD16HLA-DR NO-producing myeloid-derived regulatory cells, which are phenotypically similar to MDSCs, were found in the airways of patients with asthma but not in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or in healthy control subjects [24]. These cells suppressed the proliferation of activated autologous CD4+T cells.

Patients with COPD have elevated levels of circulating-lineage HLA-DRCD33+CD11b+ MDSCs [25]. It was recently reported that collagen type 1+CD45dimCD34CD14CD15+ MDSC-like fibrocytes are increased in the lungs and peripheral blood of COPD patients compared to control subjects [26]. The intensity of collagen type 1 staining, which marks MDSC-like fibrocytes, was positively associated with lung function; these cells appeared to play a role in air trapping, predominately in the upper lobes.

We recently reported that MDSCs are expanded in the lungs of SKG mice with interstitial lung disease (ILD) [27]. Other researchers demonstrated that CCR2+ M-MDSCs inhibit collagen degradation and promote lung fibrosis by producing transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) [28].

The number of circulating activated MDSCs was found to be significantly increased in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) compared to control subjects, and was correlated with an increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure [29]. However, a direct mechanistic role for MDSCs in pulmonary hypertension and inflammation-associated vascular remodeling has yet to be defined.

Thus, MDSCs in the lungs appear to suppress inflammation in several diseases, including asthma, COPD, ILD, and PH. However, MDSCs may promote lung fibrosis under certain conditions.


A healthy joint has a thin synovial membrane and synovial fluid that does not contain leukocytes. Under arthritic conditions, leukocytes, including both innate and adaptive immune cells, infiltrate the joint cavity and cause proliferation of the synovium [30, 31]. The infiltrating leukocytes include macrophages, DCs, granulocytes, and lymphocytes. Leukocyte infiltration and the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines encourage pre-osteoclasts to mature into osteoclasts that erode the bone. The proliferating synovium secretes matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and collagenase, leading to the destruction of cartilage.

Egelston et al. identified MDSCs in the joints of mice with proteoglycan-induced arthritis, a model of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [32]. G-MDSCs obtained from the synovial fluid suppressed DC maturation and T cell proliferation upon co-culture, primarily by producing NO and ROS (which are usually produced by G-MDSCs). Fujii et al. revealed that MDSCs play a crucial role in regulating mouse collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) [33, 34]. MDSCs from the spleens of arthritic mice suppressed the proliferation of CD4+ T cells and their differentiation into Th17 cells in vitro. Moreover, the adoptive transfer of spleen-derived MDSCs reduced the severity of arthritis, and depleting MDSCs canceled this effect in vivo. Another report showed similar results in CIA and antigen-induced arthritis models [35]. Nishimura et al. found that tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor, facilitates the expansion of MDSCs and ameliorates arthritis in SKG mice [36]. On the other hand, Zhang et al. reported that MDSCs are pro-inflammatory and aggravate arthritis in CIA [37]. However, although this group phenotypically defined CD11b+Gr1+ cells as MDSCs, the cells could not be distinguished from neutrophils or monocytes.

Little is known about MDSCs in human arthritis. Kurkó et al. reported that MDSCs were present in the synovial fluid (SF) of RA patients [38], and that while CD11b+CD33+HLADRlo/−CD14CD15+ G-MDSC-like cells were predominant, there was also a small CD11b+CD33+HLA-DRlo/−CD14+CD15 monocytic subset. The SF-MDSCs from RA patients significantly suppressed the anti-CD3/CD28 antibody-induced proliferation of autologous T cells.

These findings indicate that MDSCs, especially G-MDSCs, ameliorate arthritis by suppressing T cell proliferation and DC maturation in the joints.


The liver clears gut-derived microbial products from the blood, while functions as a metabolic organ. The unique microenvironments in the liver induce tolerogenic myeloid cells, including MDSCs, under conditions such as liver inflammation and fibrosis [39]. The recruitment and differentiation of MDSCs in the liver is promoted by mechanisms that depend on contact between various cell types and on soluble mediators. For example, hepatic stellate cells can induce MDSCs from myeloid cells in mice and humans [40]. The induction of MDSCs by hepatic stellate cells depends on CD44-mediated, direct cell–cell contact in humans [41], but on soluble factors such as IFN-γ or complement C3 in mice [42, 43]. Human mesenchymal stromal cells can also induce the expansion of MDSCs via hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor, c-Met [43]. IL-6 induces MDSCs to accumulate in the liver, where they protect mice from liver injury mediated by CD8+ T cells [44].

The frequency of MDSCs is elevated in the peripheral blood of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection [45, 46]. CD11b+HLA-DRlowCD14+CD33+ MDSCs in the blood of patients with chronic HCV suppress T cells using arginase [45]. MDSCs also produce ROS, which inhibit T cell function in chronic HCV [46], and this might be one of the mechanisms by which HCV promotes persistent infection.

MDSCs are involved in the pathogenesis of a mouse model of autoimmune hepatitis. Th1 cell-mediated liver inflammation can induce MDSCs in BALB/c Tgfb1−/− mice, which develop an acute autoimmune liver injury [47]; IFN-γ production by CD4+ T cells is necessary for inducing MDSCs in this model. MDSCs, especially M-MDSCs, were found to suppress CD4+ T cell proliferation in this model via NO production, IFN-γ, and cell–cell contact. Zhang et al. also reported that MDSCs are involved in murine immunological hepatic injury [48]. Inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) with rapamycin induced the recruitment of CD11b+Gr1+Ly6Chi MDSCs to the liver and protected against immunological hepatic injury. Downregulating the mTOR activity in MDSCs induced iNOS and NO, and the pharmacological inhibition of iNOS completely eliminated the recruitment of MDSCs.

MDSCs were elevated in the liver of a murine fulminant hepatitis model [49]; in this model, IL-25 induced MDSCs to accumulate in the liver, where they protected mice from acute hepatic damage induced by d-galactosamine and lipopolysaccharides.

Some studies indicate that MDSCs are involved in chronic liver injury and the development of liver fibrosis. Suh et al. reported that bone marrow-derived MDSCs ameliorated carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis in mice by producing IL-10 [50]. Activated hepatic stellate cells enhanced the MDSC expression of IL-10, which in turn suppressed the profibrotic function of activated hepatic stellate cells. Another study showed that M-MDSCs accumulated in the liver in the presence of inflammation and fibrosis in bile duct-ligated mice [51]. In addition, depleting MDSCs in the liver enhanced fibrosis markers, indicating that MDSCs play a protective role against organ fibrosis.

Thus, in the liver, MDSCs (especially M-MDSCs) prevent liver inflammation and fibrosis by suppressing immunogenic T cells.


The kidneys are frequently targeted by pathogenic immune responses against renal autoantigens or by local manifestations of systemic autoimmunity [52, 53]. Inflammation and immune system activation are important causal factors in the development of both acute and chronic renal disease [54]. Recent reports indicate that MDSCs are a key regulator for terminating excessive inflammation, but can also contribute to renal fibrosis.

MDSCs, especially G-MDSCs, ameliorate acute kidney injury (AKI). Rapamycin enhanced this protective effect by recruiting MDSCs, regulating MDSC induction, and strengthening the MDSC immunosuppressive activity in a mouse AKI model [55]). In mice fed an adenine-enriched diet, G-MDSCs were found to accumulate in the kidney during chronic kidney inflammation and fibrosis [51]. In addition, depleting MDSCs in the kidney enhanced fibrosis markers, indicating that MDSCs play a protective role against fibrosis. Li et al. reported that the efficacy of glucocorticoids in ameliorating focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) depends on the MDSCs’ capacity to expand [56]. After glucocorticoid treatment, the frequency of CD11b+HLA-DRCD14CD15+ MDSCs in peripheral blood was increased in patients with glucocorticoid-sensitive FSGS. In mice, glucocorticoid treatment increased the frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood, bone marrow, spleen, kidney-draining lymph nodes, and kidney. The induced MDSCs from glucocorticoid-treated mice were found to strongly suppress T cells, DCs, and macrophages but to induce regulatory T cells in the spleen, kidney-draining lymph nodes, and kidney.

Thus, MDSCs, especially G-MDSCs, suppress inflammation and fibrosis in the kidney by controlling the excessive expansion of effector T cells, DCs, and macrophages.


The intestine, which is the largest immune organ, is continually exposed to antigens and immunomodulatory agents from the diet and from commensal microbiota [57]. An imbalance between effector T cells and regulatory cells in the intestine causes mucosal and systemic inflammation. Many studies report relationships between MDSCs and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in humans and experimental mouse model systems [58]. In the first description of MDSC development in a murine IBD model, Haile et al. reported that MDSCs were induced in both the spleen and intestine and that they suppressed CD8+ T cell proliferation ex vivo by producing NO [59]. The same study showed that the peripheral blood from IBD patients had an increased frequency of MDSCs, denoted as CD14+HLADR−/low cells. Su et al. showed that the adoptive transfer of bone marrow-derived G-MDSCs into mice with 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis improved survival in the recipient mice and decreased injury scores, myeloperoxidase activities, and serum IL-6 levels [60]. Other researchers reported that the adoptive transfer of splenic MDSCs reduced inflammation and promoted mucosal healing in a dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis model [61]. MDSCs are induced by a strong variety factors such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), GM-CSF, TGF-β, and inflammatory cytokines. In addition to these factors, the antioxidant resveratrol, a naturally occurring polyphenol, induced Arg-1-expressing MDSCs in the colon of IL-10−/− mice [62].

These findings suggest that both M-MDSCs and G-MDSCs protect the intestines from excessive inflammation.

Central nervous system

The CNS has long been considered an immune-privileged site because the brain parenchyma, the interstitial fluid, and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are isolated from the blood by two barriers, the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and the blood–CSF barrier (BCSFB). Despite these barriers, immune cells are detected in both the brain parenchyma and the CSF. Under pathological conditions, the integrity of the BBB and the BCSFB can be disturbed to allow the entry of inflammatory cells [63]. Recent studies have shown that, in the context of neuroimmunology, MDSCs are both powerful controllers of T cell activity and important modulatory agents for recovery from immunological insults [64].

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is a commonly used mouse model of multiple sclerosis (MS), a T cell-mediated autoimmune inflammatory disease of the CNS [65]. Several recent studies report that MDSCs are involved in MS. Zhu et al. revealed that CD11b+Ly6Chi cells accumulated in the bone marrow, blood, spleen, and CNS of mice during the course of EAE and that M-MDSCs isolated from the spleen suppressed the proliferation of CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells via NO production ex vivo [66]. Interestingly, the regulation of T cells by the CD11b+Ly6Chi cells was determined by the MDSCs’ activation state and was plastic during the immune response [67]. IFN-γ, GM-CSF, TNF-α, and CD154 derived from the T cells activated the CD11b+Ly6Chi cells during their interactions. Activated CD11b+Ly6Chi cells suppressed T cells, but non-activated CD11b+Ly6Chi cells functioned as antigen-presenting cells (APCs). In EAE, the CD11b+Ly6Chi cells in the CNS were increasingly activated from disease onset to peak, and switched their function from antigen presentation to T cell suppression. Furthermore, the transfer of activated CD11b+Ly6Chi cells enhanced T cell apoptosis in the CNS and suppressed EAE. On the other hand, CD11b+Ly6G+ cells, which are G-MDSCs, accumulate abundantly within the peripheral lymphoid compartments and CNS of mice with EAE prior to remission of the disease [68]. Although the contribution of MDSCs to MS is less clear in humans, Ioannou et al. found significantly more G-MDSCs in the peripheral blood of MS patients at relapse than in the remission period or in control subjects [68]).

M-MDSCs are also critical in resolving acute inflammation and subsequently repairing the damaged tissue after spinal cord injury (SCI) in mice [69]. Furthermore, HMGB1-R AGE signaling promoted the expansion of CD11b+Ly-6C+MHC-IIlow cells, which helped to resolve inflammation after a stroke in a murine ischemia model [70]. Interestingly, a similar increase in CD11b+CD33+HLA-DR MDSCs was detected in the peripheral blood of stroke patients.

Collectively, both M-MDSCs and G-MDSCs contribute to the resolution of T cell-mediated CNS inflammation and the repair of CNS injury.


In the eyes, local immune and inflammatory responses are limited, to preserve vision. This phenomenon, known as ocular immune privilege, is mediated by a combination of local and systemic mechanisms [71]. In addition, backup systems to resolve inflammation are needed if ocular immune privilege fails to work. MDSCs have recently emerged as an important cellular component in resolving eye inflammation [72]. Jeong et al. recently reported that HLA-DR+CD11b+CD33+CD14+ MDSCs in humans and CD11b+Ly6GLy6C+ MDSCs in mice are markedly increased during and before the resolution phase of autoimmune uveoretinitis [73]. In experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU) mice during remission, the M-MDSCs were increased not only in the spleen and blood, but also in the retina. M-MDSCs isolated from EAU mice suppressed T cell proliferation in vitro, and the adoptive transfer of these cells accelerated the remission of autoimmune uveoretinitis in vivo.

These findings indicate that M-MDSCs serve as negative regulators to resolve eye inflammation.

MDSC plasticity

The plasticity of MDSCs has been discussed particularly in tumor models. MDSCs can differentiate into DCs, macrophages, and granulocytes. M-MDSCs from the spleen of EL-4 tumor-bearing mice differentiate into CD11b+CD11c+ DCs and CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages with GM-CSF stimulation in vitro [14]. CD11b+Gr1+ cells isolated from the spleens of tumor-bearing mice differentiate into CD11b+Gr1+F4/80+ suppressor macrophages under the influence of tumor-derived factors in vitro [74]. Furthermore, CD11b+Gr1+ cells could differentiate into immunostimulatory DCs if cultured with Th1 cytokines, IL-3, and GM-CSF. Hypoxia elicited by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α dramatically alters the function of MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment and redirects their differentiation toward tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) [75]. G-MDSCs cultured in vitro for 24 h in the presence of GM-CSF resemble neutrophils in both phenotype and function [76]. Moreover, MDSCs isolated from a bone-tumor microenvironment differentiate into osteoclasts in the presence of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator or NF-κB ligand (RANKL), and promote the destruction of bone in a mouse model of breast cancer metastasis to the bone [77].

Although little is known about the plasticity of MDSCs in non-neoplastic inflammatory conditions, recent reports demonstrate that they can differentiate into osteoclasts and tolerogenic DCs (tolDCs) (Fig. 1). Zhang et al. reported that MDSCs from the bone marrow of CIA mice can differentiate into tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)+ osteoclasts by the stimulation of M-CSF and RANKL, which are capable of bone resorption in vitro and in vivo [78]. We recently showed that in the lungs of SKG mice, M-MDSCs differentiated into CD11b+Gr1dim tolerogenic DCs (CD11b+Gr1dim tolDCs), which suppressed the progression of ILD [27]. In that report, intraperitoneally injected zymosan induced ILD with various severity. The MDSC proportion were elevated in lungs with mild or moderate ILD, and the CD11b+Gr1dim tolDC population in particular was expanded in the lungs with severe ILD. Th17 cells and groups 1 and 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC1s and ILC3s), which produced GM-CSF, were elevated in the lungs, and GM-CSF induced the M-MDSCs to differentiate into CD11b+Gr1dim tolDCs in vitro. CD11b+Gr1dim tolDCs suppressed T cell proliferation in vitro and suppressed the progression of ILD in vivo. Neutralizing TGF-β during the in vitro generation of CD11b+Gr1dim tolDCs partially canceled the cells’ suppressive effect on T cell proliferation, indicating that TGF-β was critical for the tolerogenic nature of the CD11b+Gr1dim tolDCs. These results together suggested that MDSCs suppress pathogenic lymphocytes in the early stages of inflammation. When inflammation becomes severe, GM-CSF and TGF-β induce M-MDSCs to differentiate into CD11b+Gr1dim tolDCs, which further suppress lymphocytes to control excessive inflammation. Our report indicated that MDSCs can differentiate into unique tolDCs in the severely inflamed lung.

Fig. 1

The plasticity of MDSCs in non-neoplastic inflammatory conditions. MDSCs from the bone marrow of CIA mice can differentiate into osteoclasts capable of bone resorption in vitro and in vivo. In the lungs of SKG mice, M-MDSCs differentiate into CD11b+Gr1dim tolerogenic DCs (CD11b+Gr1dim tolDCs), which suppress the progression of ILD

These reports indicate that MDSCs could differentiate into both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cells in the inflamed organs under pathogenic conditions.


MDSCs accumulate in inflamed organs. IL-6, the chemokine CCL2, rapamycin, and oxidizing agents recruit MDSCs from the bone marrow into the liver, lungs, kidneys, and intestines, respectively. On the other hand, hepatic stellate cells and mesenchymal stromal cells can induce MDSCs from myeloid cells in the liver. MDSCs negatively control inflammation by suppressing T cells and myeloid cells in inflamed organs. Moreover, they regulate fibrosis in the lungs, liver, and kidneys and may be involved in repairing CNS injuries. G-MDSCs act mostly in the joints, kidneys, intestines, and CNS, while M-MDSCs act in the lungs, liver, intestines, CNS, and eyes. MDSCs in organ microenvironments are plastic; MDSCs can differentiate into osteoclasts in the joints, and M-MDSCs can differentiate into tolDCs in the lungs. Further studies are required to characterize the behavior of MDSCs in various organs under non-neoplastic inflammatory conditions.



Acute kidney injury


Antigen-presenting cells




Blood–brain barrier


Blood–CSF barrier


Collagen-induced arthritis


Central nervous system


Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease


Cerebrospinal fluid


Dendritic cell


Dextran sulfate sodium


Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis


Experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis


Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis


Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor


Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor


Hepatitis C virus


Hypoxia-inducible factor


Inflammatory bowel diseases






Innate lymphoid cell


Interstitial lung disease


Inducible nitric oxide synthase


Macrophage colony-stimulating factor


Myeloid-derived suppressor cell


Matrix metalloproteinase


Multiple sclerosis


Mammalian target of rapamycin


Nitric oxide


Peripheral blood mononuclear cell


Pulmonary hypertension


Rheumatoid arthritis


Receptor activator or NF-κB ligand


Reactive oxygen species


Spinal cord injury


Synovial fluid


Signal transducer and activator of transcription


Tumor-associated macrophage


Transforming growth factor-β


2,4,6-Trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid


Tolerogenic dendritic cell


Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase


Regulatory T cell


  1. 1.

    Young MR, Newby M, Wepsic HT. Hematopoiesis and suppressor bone marrow cells in mice bearing large metastatic Lewis lung carcinoma tumors. Cancer Res. 1987;47(1):100–5.

  2. 2.

    Enioutina EY, Bareyan D, Daynes RA. A role for immature myeloid cells in immune senescence. J Immunol. 2011;186(2):697–707.

  3. 3.

    Cripps JG, Gorham JD. MDSC in autoimmunity. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11(7):789–93.

  4. 4.

    Veglia F, Perego M, Gabrilovich D. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells coming of age. Nat Immunol. 2018;19(2):108–19.

  5. 5.

    Youn JI, Gabrilovich DI. The biology of myeloid-derived suppressor cells: the blessing and the curse of morphological and functional heterogeneity. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40(11):2969–75.

  6. 6.

    Bronte V, Brandau S, Chen SH, Colombo MP, Frey AB, Greten TF, et al. Recommendations for myeloid-derived suppressor cell nomenclature and characterization standards. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12150.

  7. 7.

    Tcyganov E, Mastio J, Chen E, Gabrilovich DI. Plasticity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer. Curr Opin Immunol. 2018;51:76–82.

  8. 8.

    Mills CD, Kincaid K, Alt JM, Heilman MJ, Hill AM. M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm. J Immunol. 2000;164(12):6166–73.

  9. 9.

    Udalova IA, Mantovani A, Feldmann M. Macrophage heterogeneity in the context of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(8):472–85.

  10. 10.

    Das A, Sinha M, Datta S, Abas M, Chaffee S, Sen CK, et al. Monocyte and macrophage plasticity in tissue repair and regeneration. Am J Pathol. 2015;185(10):2596–606.

  11. 11.

    Gabrilovich DI, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Bronte V. Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(4):253–68.

  12. 12.

    Condamine T, Gabrilovich DI. Molecular mechanisms regulating myeloid-derived suppressor cell differentiation and function. Trends Immunol. 2011;32(1):19–25.

  13. 13.

    Rodriguez PC, Quiceno DG, Ochoa AC. L-arginine availability regulates T-lymphocyte cell-cycle progression. Blood. 2007;109(4):1568–73.

  14. 14.

    Harari O, Liao JK. Inhibition of MHC II gene transcription by nitric oxide and antioxidants. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10(8):893–8.

  15. 15.

    Youn JI, Nagaraj S, Collazo M, Gabrilovich DI. Subsets of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-bearing mice. J Immunol. 2008;181(8):5791–802.

  16. 16.

    Otsuji M, Kimura Y, Aoe T, Okamoto Y, Saito T. Oxidative stress by tumor-derived macrophages suppresses the expression of CD3 zeta chain of T-cell receptor complex and antigen-specific T-cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(23):13119–24.

  17. 17.

    Pan PY, Ma G, Weber KJ, Ozao-Choy J, Wang G, Yin B, et al. Immune stimulatory receptor CD40 is required for T-cell suppression and T regulatory cell activation mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70(1):99–108.

  18. 18.

    Shevach EM. Regulatory T cells in autoimmmunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:423–49.

  19. 19.

    O'Dwyer DN, Dickson RP, Moore BB. The lung microbiome, immunity, and the pathogenesis of chronic lung disease. J Immunol. 2016;196(12):4839–47.

  20. 20.

    Byrne AJ, Maher TM, Lloyd CM. Pulmonary macrophages: a new therapeutic pathway in fibrosing lung disease? Trends Mol Med. 2016;22(4):303–16.

  21. 21.

    Arora M, Poe SL, Oriss TB, Krishnamoorthy N, Yarlagadda M, Wenzel SE, et al. TLR4/MyD88-induced CD11b+Gr-1 int F4/80+ non-migratory myeloid cells suppress Th2 effector function in the lung. Mucosal Immunol. 2010;3(6):578–93.

  22. 22.

    Deshane J, Zmijewski JW, Luther R, Gaggar A, Deshane R, Lai JF, et al. Free radical-producing myeloid-derived regulatory cells: potent activators and suppressors of lung inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. Mucosal Immunol. 2011;4(5):503–18.

  23. 23.

    Song C, Yuan Y, Wang XM, Li D, Zhang GM, Huang B, et al. Passive transfer of tumour-derived MDSCs inhibits asthma-related airway inflammation. Scand J Immunol. 2014;79(2):98–104.

  24. 24.

    Deshane JS, Redden DT, Zeng M, Spell ML, Zmijewski JW, Anderson JT, et al. Subsets of airway myeloid-derived regulatory cells distinguish mild asthma from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(2):413–24.

  25. 25.

    Scrimini S, Pons J, Agustí A, Soriano JB, Cosio BG, Torrecilla JA, et al. Differential effects of smoking and COPD upon circulating myeloid derived suppressor cells. Respir Med. 2013;107(12):1895–903.

  26. 26.

    Wright AK, Newby C, Hartley RA, Mistry V, Gupta S, Berair R, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell-like fibrocytes are increased and associated with preserved lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Allergy. 2017;72(4):645–55.

  27. 27.

    Sendo S, Saegusa J, Okano T, Takahashi S, Akashi K, Morinobu A. CD11b+Gr-1dim tolerogenic dendritic cell-like cells are expanded in interstitial lung disease in SKG mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(12):2314–27.

  28. 28.

    Lebrun A, Lo Re S, Chantry M, Izquierdo Carerra X, Uwambayinema F, Ricci D, et al. CCR2+ monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSCs) inhibit collagen degradation and promote lung fibrosis by producing transforming growth factor-β1. J Pathol. 2017;243(3):320–30.

  29. 29.

    Yeager ME, Nguyen CM, Belchenko DD, Colvin KL, Takatsuki S, Ivy DD, et al. Circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells are increased and activated in pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2012;141(4):944–52.

  30. 30.

    Tak PP, Smeets TJ, Daha MR, Kluin PM, Meijers KA, Brand R, et al. Analysis of the synovial cell infiltrate in early rheumatoid synovial tissue in relation to local disease activity. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(2):217–25.

  31. 31.

    Kraan MC, Reece RJ, Smeets TJ, Veale DJ, Emery P, Tak PP. Comparison of synovial tissues from the knee joints and the small joints of rheumatoid arthritis patients: implications for pathogenesis and evaluation of treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(8):2034–8.

  32. 32.

    Egelston C, Kurkó J, Besenyei T, Tryniszewska B, Rauch TA, Glant TT, et al. Suppression of dendritic cell maturation and T cell proliferation by synovial fluid myeloid cells from mice with autoimmune arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(10):3179–88.

  33. 33.

    Fujii W, Ashihara E, Hirai H, Nagahara H, Kajitani N, Fujioka K, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells play crucial roles in the regulation of mouse collagen-induced arthritis. J Immunol. 2013;191(3):1073–81.

  34. 34.

    Fujii W, Ashihara E, Kawahito W. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in autoimmune diseases. Inflamm Regen. 2014;34(3):124–7.

  35. 35.

    Zhang L, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Wu M, Wang Y. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells protect mouse models from autoimmune arthritis via controlling inflammatory response. Inflammation. 2014;37(3):670–7.

  36. 36.

    Nishimura K, Saegusa J, Matsuki F, Akashi K, Kageyama G, Morinobu A. Tofacitinib facilitates the expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and ameliorates arthritis in SKG mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(4):893–902.30.

  37. 37.

    Zhang H, Wang S, Huang Y, Wang H, Zhao J, Gaskin F, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells are proinflammatory and regulate collagen-induced arthritis through manipulating Th17 cell differentiation. Clin Immunol. 2015;157(2):175–86.

  38. 38.

    Kurkó J, Vida A, Glant TT, Scanzello CR, Katz RS, Nair A, et al. Identification of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:281.

  39. 39.

    Hammerich L, Tacke F. Emerging roles of myeloid derived suppressor cells in hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2015;6(3):43–50.

  40. 40.

    Höchst B, Schildberg FA, Sauerborn P, Gäbel YA, Gevensleben H, Goltz D, et al. Activated human hepatic stellate cells induce myeloid derived suppressor cells from peripheral blood monocytes in a CD44-dependent fashion. J Hepatol. 2013;59(3):528–35.

  41. 41.

    Chou HS, Hsieh CC, Yang HR, Wang L, Arakawa Y, Brown K, et al. Hepatic stellate cells regulate immune response by way of induction of myeloid suppressor cells in mice. Hepatology. 2011;53(3):1007–19.

  42. 42.

    Hsieh CC, Chou HS, Yang HR, Lin F, Bhatt S, Qin J, et al. The role of complement component 3 (C3) in differentiation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Blood. 2013;121(10):1760–8.

  43. 43.

    Yen BL, Yen ML, Hsu PJ, Liu KJ, Wang CJ, Bai CH, et al. Multipotent human mesenchymal stromal cells mediate expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells via hepatocyte growth factor/c-met and STAT3. Stem Cell Rep. 2013;1(2):139–51.

  44. 44.

    Cheng L, Wang J, Li X, Xing Q, Du P, Su L, et al. Interleukin-6 induces Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid cells to suppress CD8+ T cell-mediated liver injury in mice. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17631.

  45. 45.

    Cai W, Qin A, Guo P, Yan D, Hu F, Yang Q, et al. Clinical significance and functional studies of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in chronic hepatitis C patients. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33(4):798–808.

  46. 46.

    Tacke RS, Lee HC, Goh C, Courtney J, Polyak SJ, Rosen HR, et al. Myeloid suppressor cells induced by hepatitis C virus suppress T-cell responses through the production of reactive oxygen species. Hepatology. 2012;55(2):343–53.

  47. 47.

    Cripps JG, Wang J, Maria A, Blumenthal I, Gorham JD. Type 1 T helper cells induce the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the inflamed Tgfb1 knockout mouse liver. Hepatology. 2010;52(4):1350–9.

  48. 48.

    Zhang Y, Bi Y, Yang H, Chen X, Liu H, Lu Y, et al. mTOR limits the recruitment of CD11b+Gr1+Ly6Chigh myeloid-derived suppressor cells in protecting against murine immunological hepatic injury. J Leukoc Biol. 2014;95(6):961–70.

  49. 49.

    Sarra M, Cupi ML, Bernardini R, Ronchetti G, Monteleone I, Ranalli M, et al. IL-25 prevents and cures fulminant hepatitis in mice through a myeloid-derived suppressor cell-dependent mechanism. Hepatology. 2013;58(4):1436–50.

  50. 50.

    Suh YG, Kim JK, Byun JS, Yi HS, Lee YS, Eun HS, et al. CD11b(+) Gr1(+) bone marrow cells ameliorate liver fibrosis by producing interleukin-10 in mice. Hepatology. 2012;56(5):1902–12.

  51. 51.

    Höchst B, Mikulec J, Baccega T, Metzger C, Welz M, Peusquens J, et al. Differential induction of Ly6G and Ly6C positive myeloid derived suppressor cells in chronic kidney and liver inflammation and fibrosis. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119662.

  52. 52.

    Beck LH Jr, Bonegio RG, Lambeau G, Beck DM, Powell DW, Cummins TD, et al. M-type phospholipase A2 receptor as target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(1):11–21.

  53. 53.

    Kurts C, Panzer U, Anders HJ, Rees AJ. The immune system and kidney disease: basic concepts and clinical implications. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(10):738–53.

  54. 54.

    Imig JD, Ryan MJ. Immune and inflammatory role in renal disease. Compr Physiol. 2013;3(2):957–76.

  55. 55.

    Zhang C, Wang S, Li J, Zhang W, Zheng L, Yang C, et al. The mTOR signal regulates myeloid-derived suppressor cells differentiation and immunosuppressive function in acute kidney injury. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(3):e2695.

  56. 56.

    Li L, Zhang T, Diao W, Jin F, Shi L, Meng J, et al. Role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in glucocorticoid-mediated amelioration of FSGS. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(9):2183–97.

  57. 57.

    Mowat AM, Agace WW. Regional specialization within the intestinal immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(10):667–85.

  58. 58.

    Ostanin DV, Bhattacharya D. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(11):2468–77.

  59. 59.

    Haile LA, von Wasielewski R, Gamrekelashvili J, Krüger C, Bachmann O, Westendorf AM, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in inflammatory bowel disease: a new immunoregulatory pathway. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(3):871–81. e1–5

  60. 60.

    Su H, Cong X, Liu YL. Transplantation of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (G-MDSCs) could reduce colitis in experimental murine models. J Dig Dis. 2013;14(5):251–8.

  61. 61.

    Zhang R, Ito S, Nishio N, Cheng Z, Suzuki H, Isobe KI. Dextran sulphate sodium increases splenic Gr1(+)CD11b(+) cells which accelerate recovery from colitis following intravenous transplantation. Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;164(3):417–27.

  62. 62.

    Singh UP, Singh NP, Singh B, Hofseth LJ, Taub DD, Price RL, et al. Role of resveratrol-induced CD11b(+) Gr-1(+) myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the reduction of CXCR3(+) T cells and amelioration of chronic colitis in IL-10(−/−) mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26(1):72–82.

  63. 63.

    Poli A, Kmiecik J, Domingues O, Hentges F, Bléry M, Chekenya M, et al. NK cells in central nervous system disorders. J Immunol. 2013;190(11):5355–62.

  64. 64.

    Melero-Jerez C, Ortega MC, Moliné-Velázquez V, Clemente D. Myeloid derived suppressor cells in inflammatory conditions of the central nervous system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1862(3):368–80.

  65. 65.

    Roder J, Hickey WF. Mouse models, immunology, multiple sclerosis and myelination. Nat Genet. 1996;12(1):6–8.

  66. 66.

    Zhu B, Bando Y, Xiao S, Yang K, Anderson AC, Kuchroo VK, et al. CD11b+Ly-6C(hi) suppressive monocytes in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2007;179(8):5228–37.

  67. 67.

    Zhu B, Kennedy JK, Wang Y, Sandoval-Garcia C, Cao L, Xiao S, et al. Plasticity of Ly-6C(hi) myeloid cells in T cell regulation. J Immunol. 2011;187(5):2418–32.

  68. 68.

    Ioannou M, Alissafi T, Lazaridis I, Deraos G, Matsoukas J, Gravanis A, et al. Crucial role of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the regulation of central nervous system autoimmune disease. J Immunol. 2012;188(3):1136–46.

  69. 69.

    Saiwai H, Kumamaru H, Ohkawa Y, Kubota K, Kobayakawa K, Yamada H, et al. Ly6C+ Ly6G- Myeloid-derived suppressor cells play a critical role in the resolution of acute inflammation and the subsequent tissue repair process after spinal cord injury. J Neurochem. 2013;125(1):74–88.

  70. 70.

    Liesz A, Dalpke A, Mracsko E, Antoine DJ, Roth S, Zhou W, et al. DAMP signaling is a key pathway inducing immune modulation after brain injury. J Neurosci. 2015;35(2):583–98.

  71. 71.

    Zhou R, Caspi RR. Ocular immune privilege. F1000 Biol Rep. 2010;2.

  72. 72.

    Kerr EC, Raveney BJ, Copland DA, Dick AD, Nicholson LB. Analysis of retinal cellular infiltrate in experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis reveals multiple regulatory cell populations. J Autoimmun. 2008;31(4):354–61.

  73. 73.

    Jeong HJ, Lee HJ, Ko JH, Cho BJ, Park SY, Park JW, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells mediate inflammation resolution in humans and mice with autoimmune uveoretinitis. J Immunol. 2018;200(4):1306–15.

  74. 74.

    Narita Y, Wakita D, Ohkur T, Chamoto K, Nishimura T. Potential differentiation of tumor bearing mouse CD11b+Gr-1+ immature myeloid cells into both suppressor macrophages and immunostimulatory dendritic cells. Biomed Res. 2009;30(1):7–15.

  75. 75.

    Corzo CA, Condamine T, Lu L, Cotter MJ, Youn JI, Cheng P, et al. HIF-1α regulates function and differentiation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment. J Exp Med. 2010;207(11):2439–53.

  76. 76.

    Youn JI, Collazo M, Shalova IN, Biswas SK, Gabrilovich DI. Characterization of the nature of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-bearing mice. J Leukoc Biol. 2012;91(1):167–81.

  77. 77.

    Sawant A, Deshane J, Jules J, Lee CM, Harris BA, Feng X, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells function as novel osteoclast progenitors enhancing bone loss in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73(2):672–82.

  78. 78.

    Zhang H, Huang Y, Wang S, Fu R, Guo C, Wang H, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells contribute to bone erosion in collagen-induced arthritis by differentiating to osteoclasts. J Autoimmun. 2015;65:82–9.

Download references


We are grateful to our colleagues and laboratory members for their helpful suggestions and experimental assistance.

Author information

SS drafted the manuscript. JS helped to draft the manuscript. AM gave the final approval of the version to be submitted and any revised version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Akio Morinobu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sendo, S., Saegusa, J. & Morinobu, A. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in non-neoplastic inflamed organs. Inflamm Regener 38, 19 (2018).

Download citation


  • MDSC
  • Inflammation
  • T cell
  • Myeloid cell
  • Organ
  • Plasticity