- Research article
- Open Access
Generation of a BAC transgenic mouse strain that expresses CreERT and a fluorescent protein under the transcriptional control of the Fzd5 locus
Inflammation and Regeneration volume 42, Article number: 6 (2022)
The expression of FZD5 distinguishes immature human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) in cultures, and the function of FZD5 is crucial for maintaining the proliferation and multilineage differentiation capacity of human MSC. We herein investigated whether Fzd5 expression also marks undifferentiated MSC in animals.
We generated a transgenic mouse strain (Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635) that expresses CreERT and the fluorescent protein, TurboFP635 (tFP635), under the transcriptional control of the Fzd5 gene using the BAC transgenic technique, and identified cells expressing tFP635 by flow cytometry. We also conducted lineage tracing with this strain.
In the bone marrow of transgenic mice, tFP635 was preferentially expressed in MSC, Leptin receptor-expressing MSC (LepR+MSCs), and some Pdgfrα+ Sca1+ MSC (PαS). Inducible lineage tracing using the Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635; CAG-CAT-EGFP strain at the adult stage showed that Fzd5-expressing cells and their descendants labeled with GFP were progressively dominant in LepR+MSC and PαS, and GFP+ cells persisted for 1 year after the activation of CreERT. Adipocyte progenitor cells (APCs), osteoblast progenitor cells (OPCs), and Cd51+ stromal cells were also labeled with GFP.
Our transgenic mouse marks two different types of MSC, LepR+MSC and PαS.
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) self-renew and differentiate into mesenchymal lineages and reside in the bone marrow (BM) and other tissues. MSC have been isolated by plastic adherence and subsequent cultivation since the 1970s [1, 2]. In the last two decades, researchers have developed a strategy to prospectively isolate MSC from mouse BM and other tissues using monoclonal antibodies and/or reporter mice and identified various MSC fractions in vivo . BM reticular cells expressing high levels of CXCL12 have been identified as CXCL12-abundant reticular cells (CAR cells), which preserve their self-renewal capacity and multilineage differentiation capacity in vitro and exhibit a lifelong self-renewal capacity in vivo. Histochemical analyses and cell ablation experiments revealed that CAR cells are an important source of niche factors that are required for the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) [4, 5]. BM stromal cells, which express the leptin receptor (LepR+MSC), contribute to adipogenesis and osteogenesis in BM [6, 7]. LepR+MSC is also a component of the perisinusoidal niche and express the niche factors, Kitl and Cxcl12. Functionally, the conditional deletion of Kitl or Cxcl12 in LepR+MSC leads to the depletion or mobilization of HSC, respectively, in BM. Therefore, LepR+MSC is critical for the maintenance of HSC and retention of HSC in the BM. A recent comparative analysis revealed that CAR cells and LepR+MSCs were substantially overlapping populations [8,9,10]. Cd51+Pdgfrα+ BM stromal cells form mesenspheres with a capacity for mesenchymal lineage differentiation. NG2+ Nestin-GFPbright periarteriolar cells also maintain MSC properties, and Cd51+Pdgfrα+ stromal cells are a subpopulation of Nestin-GFP+ cells . On the other hand, cultured MSCs exert immunomodulatory functions through various pathways and have been applied to clinical treatments [12, 13]. Accordingly, beyond the homeostasis of the mesenchymal cell population, BM-MSC are involved in the regulation of hematopoiesis and immune responses through the secretion of various cytokines and chemokines.
To date, various MSC fractions have been identified in mouse BM, and the function(s) of each BM-MSC are being revealed. However, many questions remain unanswered in MSC biology, such as whether known MSCs originate from a common “bona fide undifferentiated MSC,” if a hierarchical relationship exists between known MSCs, and how the proliferation, differentiation, and function(s) of each MSC are controlled. We previously demonstrated that mouse BM stromal cells expressing Pdgfrα and Sca1, named PαS, are highly enriched MSC with a high proliferative capacity and differentiation potential toward a mesenchymal lineage in vitro and in the transplantation setting . We recently performed extensive gene expression profiling on human MSC clones and showed that Frizzled5 (FZD5), a receptor for the WNT signaling molecule, was exclusively expressed in highly functional and immature human MSC clones. Gain- and loss-of-function analyses revealed that FZD5 negatively regulated cellular senescence in human MSC, thereby maintaining proliferation and multilineage potency .
To investigate whether the expression of Fzd5 marks immature MSC in mouse, we herein generated a reporter mouse strain (Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635) that expresses CreERT and fluorescent protein, TurboFP635 (tFP635), under the control of the transcriptional regulatory sequence of the Fzd5 gene using BAC transgenic technology. In the BM of transgenic mice, tFP635 is preferentially expressed in LepR+MSC and a part of PαS. A lineage tracing experiment with Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635; CAG-CAT-EGFP showed that LepR+MSC and PαS were labeled with GFP, the frequency of GFP+ cells in these fractions increased over time after the activation of CreERT, and GFP+ cells were maintained for up to 1 year, showing that our transgenic mouse marks two types of MSC, LepR+MSC, and PαS.
Generation of BAC transgenic mice
Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635 were generated using the BAC transgenic technique. The coding sequence of the Fzd5 gene in the BAC clone, RP23-142C12, was replaced with a 4.3 Kb DNA fragment containing CreERT and three copies of tFP635 cDNA in Escherichia coli using the Red/ET Recombination System (Gene Bridges). Recombined BAC DNA was then injected into pronuclei and transplanted into pseudopregnant females. Ten independent founder lines were obtained after screening 60 F0 mice with Southern blotting using the Cre cDNA probe, and the lines A, F, G, H, and I were described herein.
B6.129(Cg)-Leprtm2(cre)Rck/J (LepR-Cre, JAX lab #008320) and B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm14(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J (ROSA-CAG-LSL-tdTomato, JAX lab #007914) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory and backcrossed at least six times onto a C57BL/6J background. CAG-CAT-EGFP mice  were kindly provided by Dr. Jun-ichi Miyazaki (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan). All mice were maintained in the C57BL6J background.
In lineage tracing experiments, Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635 or LepR-Cre were crossed with CAG-CAT-EGFP or ROSA-CAG-LSL-tdTomato, respectively, and compound mice were obtained. To induce CreERT activity in Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635; CAG-CAT-EGFP, 8- to 12-week-old mice were intraperitoneally injected with 100 μl of tamoxifen (TM) dissolved in corn oil at a concentration of 10 mg/ml for 3 or 5 consecutive days.
Preparation of femur sections
The femur was cryosectioned using the Kawamoto film method .
Preparation of BM cells for FCM and cell sorting
PαS is enriched in collagenase-released cells (CR)—the cells released from bone fragments with collagenase digestion . In contrast, LepR+MSC comprise some reticular cells and reside in BM. Therefore, a femur and tibia pair was processed to prepare a single-cell suspension containing CR for the detection of PαS, and the other pair was used to prepare BM and detect LepR+MSC. To prepare the single-cell suspension for PαS staining, the femur and tibia were minced with scissors and incubated at 37°C for 30 min in collagenase solution [DMEM (Wako Chemicals) containing 0.2% collagenase (Wako Chemicals), 25 units/mL deoxyribonuclease I (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM HEPES, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin]. Bone fragments were tapped with a mortar and pestle 50–100 times and filtered with a cell strainer (Falcon 2350) to remove debris and bone pieces. Cells were collected by centrifugation at 300×g at 4°C for 5 min, hemolyzed, and washed with FACS buffer (PBS supplemented with 2% FBS). Regarding LepR+MSC staining, BM cells were isolated by flushing from femurs and tibias, followed by enzyme digestion with collagenase and deoxyribonuclease I solution at 37°C for 20 min. After hemolysis, BM cells were washed with FACS buffer and filtered.
FCM and cell sorting
FCM and cell sorting were performed using antibodies recognizing the following antigens: Cd45 (30-F11), Ter119 (TER-119), Pdgfrα (APA5), Sca1 (D7), Cd31(MEC13.3), Cd51 (HMαV-1), Cd24 (M1/69 or 30-F1), and the leptin receptor (goat polyclonal antibody). These antibodies were purchased from eBioScience, BioLegend, TONBO, and R&D Systems. Dead cells were eliminated by staining with 1 μg/mL propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich). PαS (Cd45-Ter119-Pdgfrα+Sca1+), LepR+MSC (Cd45-Ter119-Cd31-Sca1-LepR+), APC (Cd45-Ter119-Cd31-Cd24-Sca1+), OPC (Cd45-Ter119-Cd31-Pdgfrα+Sca1-), and Cd51+ stromal cells (Cd45-Ter119-Cd31-Cd51+) were defined as described elsewhere. The combination of antibodies was as follows:
PαS+tFP635; Biotin-anti-Pdgfrα, Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-anti-Sca1, Phycoerythrin (PE)-anti-Cd45, PE-anti-Ter119, and Allophycocyanin (APC)-Streptavidin. PαS+GFP; PE-anti-Pdgfrα, APC-anti-Cd45, APC-anti-Ter119, and Brilliant violet 421 (BV421)-anti-Sca1. LepR+MSC+tFP635; Biotin-anti-Pdgfrα, FITC-anti-Sca1, PE-anti-Cd45, PE-anti-Ter119, PE-anti-Cd31, and APC-Streptavidin. LepR+MSC+GFP; Biotin-anti-LepR, PE-anti-Cd31, APC-Cy7-anti-Cd45, APC-Cy7-anti-Ter119, PE-Cy7-anti-Sca1, and BV421-Streptavidin. APC/OPC+GFP; Biotin-anti-Cd24, PE-Streptavidin, APC-anti-Pdgfrα, APC-Cy7-anti-Cd45, APC-Cy7-anti-Ter119, PE-Cy7-anti-Cd31, and BV421-anti-Sca1. Cd51+Stroma+GFP; Biotin-anti-Cd51, PE-Streptavidin, APC-Cy7-anti-Cd45, APC-Cy7-anti-Ter119, and BV421-anti-Cd31. Sorting of PαS subfractions; Biotin-anti-Pdgfrα, FITC-anti-Sca1, PE-anti-Cd45, PE-anti-Ter119, and APC-Streptavidin.
Cell sorting and the analysis of tFP635 expression were performed on MoFlo (Beckman Coulter Life Sciences) equipped with a yellow-green laser, while other analyses were conducted on CytoFLEX (Beckman Coulter Life Sciences).
MSC adherent culture
Sorted cells were cultured in growth medium (DMEM [Wako chemicals] supplemented with 20% FBS, 10 mM HEPES, and antibiotics) and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. Medium was replenished every 3–4 days.
Approximately 500 sorted cells were seeded on a 100-mm dish in growth medium. A colony was defined as a cluster of 50 or more cells.
Adipogenic differentiation was induced using hMSC Adipogenic differentiation Medium Bullet Kit (LONZA) for 6 days, while osteogenic differentiation was induced with osteogenic media (DMEM supplemented 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, 50 μM L-ascorbic acid, and 1 mM dexamethasone) for 21 days. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and stained with either Oil Red O or Alizarin Red according to standard protocol, and then images were acquired with a BZ-X700 fluorescent microscope (Keyence). After conversion to black and white image, the area with stains was quantified with ImageJ software.
The total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and reverse-transcribed by the PrimeScript Reverse Transcriptase (TaKaRa Bio, Japan) with a random hexamer primer. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed with the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific). The primer sequences used were as follows:
Hprt1, 5’-TCCTCCTCAGACCGCTTTT-3’, and 5’-CCTGGTTCATCATCGCTAATC-3’; Fzd5, 5’-CAGCAGGATCCTCCGAGA-3’, and 5’-CAGCACTCAGTTCCACACCA-3’; Cxcl12, 5’-CCAGAGCCAACGTCAAGCAT-3’, and 5’-CAGCCGTGCAACAATCTGAA-3’; Kitl, 5’-GGTAGCTAGTTCTATCCATGCGGT-3’, and 5’-CCTGTAAGGACTTTTCTGGAGAGTCT-3’; FoxC1, 5’-CACTCGGTGCGGGAAATGT-3’, and 5’-GGTACAGAGACTGACTGGCA-3’; Lepr, 5’-GTTCCAAACCCCAAGAATTG-3’, and 5’-TGATTCTGCATGCTTGGTAAA-3’; Nes, 5’-TCCCTTAGTCTGGAAGTGGCTA-3’, and 5’-GGTGTCTGCAAGCGAGAGTT-3’; Cspg4, 5’-GCAGAGGAGGTCTTGGTGAA-3’, and 5’-GGACATCTCGTGCTCATACAGA-3’.
Statistical analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism version 9. The significance of differences was measured by the Student’s t test. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Significance was taken at values of *p less than .05, ** p less than .01, *** p less than .005, **** p less than .0005, and ***** p less than .00005.
Generation of BAC transgenic mice
We previously reported that FZD5 was preferentially expressed in MSC clones with a high proliferative capacity and multilineage differentiation capacity in humans. FZD5-mediated WNT signaling functions as a critical negative regulator of cellular senescence. The inhibition of FZD5 with short hairpin RNA led to premature cellular senescence . These findings raised the question of whether the expression of Fzd5 also marks immature MSC in vivo. Therefore, we generated transgenic mouse strains using a BAC clone, in which the coding sequence of Fzd5 was replaced with CreERT and 3 copies of tFP635 cDNA linked with P2A sequences (Fig. 1A). Five Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635 transgenic lines (Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635A, F, G, H, and I line) from 10 independent founders were generated and backcrossed to C57BL6J mice more than 3 times to confirm transgene inheritance before assessments of BAC DNA copy numbers and an expression analysis of tFP635. Quantitative genomic PCR using primers, which amplify a 5′-UTR region in both the endogenous and exogenous Fzd5 gene, revealed the copy numbers of BAC DNA (Fig. 1B).
Localization of tFP635+ cells in the femur
To examine the anatomical localization of tFP635+ cells in BM, we performed a histological analysis of femur sections from Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635H and found that tFP635+ cells were abundant in the epiphysis and to a lesser extent in the diaphysis. tFP635+ cells showed two distinct localization patterns: cells lining the endosteum or those uniformly distributed to BM (Fig. 1C). We also observed the similar localization pattern of tFP635+ cells in the femur sections from Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635I (Additional file 1). These results demonstrated that at least two types of cells express tFP635 in Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635.
Optimization of the MSC preparation protocol
Since the anatomical localization of BM-MSC in long bones, e.g., the tibia and femur, is unique to each MSC subtype, we optimized the protocol to prepare a single-cell suspension for a flow cytometric analysis (FCM) of two identified BM-MSCs, PαS (Cd45-Ter119-Pdgfrα+Sca1+), and LepR+MSC (Cd45-Ter119-Cd31-Sca1-Pdgfrβ+Lepr+). To achieve this, dissected long bones were initially divided into 2 parts, the bone ends (BE), and bone shaft, then the shaft was flushed out to obtain “marrow”. Residual bone shaft (bone), BE, and unfractionated whole bone (WB) were separately minced and digested with collagenase and subjected to FCM (Additional file 2A, B and C). The frequency of PαS was the highest in BE, and absolute number of PαS in BE was equivalent to that of WB, suggesting that PαS mainly resided in BE (Additional file 2B, D and E). Pdgfrα single-positive cells (PDSP) and Sca1 single-positive cells (SSP) were distributed in all four fractions to some extent, and the absolute number was the most abundant in WB (Additional file 2B, D and E). In contrast, LepR+MSC exclusively resided in marrow (Additional file 2C, D and E). Notably, we noticed the Lepr+ non-hematopoietic/endothelial (Cd45-Ter119-Cd31-Sca1-) cells contained both Pdgfrβ+ and Pdgfrβ- cells. The latter was abundant in bone fraction or to some extent in BE and WB, whereas in the marrow, the Lepr+ cells were predominantly positive for Pdgfrβ (Additional file 2C). Based on these results, we prepared WB fractions from one leg to detect PαS and marrow from the other leg to identify LepR+MSCs that defined as Cd45-Ter119-Cd31-Sca1-Lepr+ cells in subsequent experiments.
tFP635 expression in Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635
To test the expression pattern of tFP635, we conducted FCM of WB and marrow from Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635I mice. In the WB fraction, tFP635+ cells were mainly located in the PDSP region, followed by the double negative (DN) and PαS, and were negligible in the SSP region (Fig. 2A). In the marrow, approximately 90% of tFP635+ cells were in Sca1- Lepr+ region (Fig. 2B). All five strains tested in the present study showed similar results with some variations (Fig. 2C, D). We noted that tFP635 was also expressed in some Cd45+ or Ter119+ hematopoietic cells (HC) (data not shown). In reverse gating, approximately 10% of PαS, 40-90% of PDSP, less than 1% of SSP/DN, and 90% of LepR+MSC (except for line F) were positive for tFP635 (Fig. 2E). In summary, cells expressing tFP635 largely overlapped with LepR+MSCs but less with PDSP. In other words, PDSPs contain more tFP635-negative cells than LepR+MSCs. So, we focused on tFP635-negative cells in the PDSPs. In an additional analysis (Fig. 2F, see also Additional file 3 for full FCM profiles), approximately 80% of PDSP were positive for tFP635 and most of them were also positive for Lepr, while the cells negative for tFP635 expression were predominantly negative for Lepr. These results showed that PDSP contains three subsets that are tFP635+LepR+MSC, tFP635+Lepr-, and tFP635-Lepr-. In PαS, more than 80% were negative for both tFP635 and Lepr (Fig. 2F–H). RT-qPCR revealed that tFP635+PDSP expressed not only Fzd5 and Lepr, but also the LepR+MSC markers, Cxcl12, Kitl, and FoxC1 [18, 19] (Fig. 2I). Collectively, these results showed that tFP635+PDSP are LepR+MSC. In addition, RT-qPCR of WB fractions revealed that Fzd5 expression is highest in PDSP, and followed by PαS, showing that the expression of tFP635 reflects endogenous Fzd5 expression (Additional file 4). Therefore, the expression of Fzd5 was mostly restricted to LepR+MSC and a part of PαS in the BM of Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635.
Cell fate of Fzd5-expressing cells
To trace the fate of Fzd5-expressing cells, mainly LepR+MSC and PαS, we crossed Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635I with CAG-CAT-EGFP, in which a loxP-flanked CAT-pA cassette impedes CAG promoter-driven GFP expression  and generated Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635; CAG-CAT-EGFP (hereafter referred to as Fzd5-GFP). In the Fzd5-GFP, the activation of CreERT irreversibly excised the cassette and induced the expression of GFP in Fzd5-expressing cells and their descendants (Fig. 3A). Fzd5-GFP were injected with TM for 3 or 5 consecutive days at between 8 and 12 weeks old to induce CreERT activity, and GFP expression was monitored in stromal fractions for 12 months (Fig. 3B–D). On day 4, approximately 10% of PαS were labeled with GFP, and GFP positivity and intensity progressively increased over time. The GFP positivity was maintained at approximately 80% for up to 12 months after the TM injection (Fig. 3B, D), whereas tFP635 along with CreERT was only expressed by a small portion of PαS cells (Fig. 2A, C, E). The proportion of GFP+ cells in SSP also increased with similar kinetics to PαS despite the lack of obvious tFP635 expression in SSP (Fig. 2A, C, E and Fig. 3D). In the marrow, approximately 30% of LepR+MSC expressed GFP by day 4, despite over 80% of LepR+MSC was positive for tFP635. GFP positivity slightly increased and was maintained at 60% for 12 months (Fig. 3C, D). It is known that TM does not necessarily work on all cells, this may explain the discrepancy with the results showing that LepR+MSC were largely positive for tFP635 (Fig. 2A–D). We also demonstrated that adipocyte progenitor cells (APC) , osteoblast progenitor cells (OPC) , and Cd51+ stromal cells were labeled with GFP at 16 weeks after the TM injection in all of the Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635 lines tested (Fig. 3E, F). We note that Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635F, G, and H showed similar results with some variations according to copy number of BAC DNA (Additional file 5). We also analyzed the expression of tFP635 and GFP in the PαS from Fzd5-GFP mice 4 weeks after TM injection and showed that more than 70% of PαS cells were GFP+tFP635- (Fig. 3G).
Lepr-tdTomato also marks PαS subpopulation
LepR+MSC have been identified as the primary source of bone and adipocytes in adult BM. Lepr-Cre marks LepR+MSC, and lineage tracing showed that LepR+MSC gave rise to osteoblasts and adipocytes in adult BM in vivo [7, 8]. Moreover, cell fate mapping with the Ebf3-CreERT strain revealed that CAR cells were self-renewing MSC in adult BM . Similarly, we herein showed that Fzd5-GFP marked LepR+MSC with CreERT and tFP635. Therefore, we examined Lepr-Cre; ROSA-CAG-LSL-tdTomato (hereafter referred to as Lepr-tdTomato) mice at 12 and 24 weeks old to directly compare the identities of the cells labeled in these two different Cre strains (Fig. 4A–C). Consistent with previous findings, virtually all LepR+MSC were positive for tdTomato in 12-week-old Lepr-tdTomato mice, and the proportion of tdTomato+LepR+MSC was maintained for another 12 weeks (Fig. 4A, C). In contrast, tdTomato expression was observed in limited PαS cells, and the proportion of tdTomato-labeled cells was low even in 24-week-old mice (Fig. 4B, C), while the frequency of GFP+PαS progressively increased in Fzd5-GFP after the TM injection. The data, together with the result that tFP635+PαS cells were largely negative for Lepr, indicates that tFP635+PαS was distinct subpopulation from tdTomato+PαS.
Fzd5-PDSP retains MSC properties
We investigated whether Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635 enable the identification of a novel MSC fraction in BM. We fractionated non-hematopoietic cells from Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635I into eight subfractions according to the expression of Sca1, Pdgfrα, and tFP635 and tested their colony-forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) activities. Among the eight subfractions, tFP635-PαS exhibited the highest CFU-F activity, followed by tFP635-PDSP and tFP635+PαS in primary plating. tFP635+PDSP, which consists of LepR+MSC, had no apparent colony-forming capacity. Of note, tFP635-PDSP formed secondary colonies at a similar frequency to the primary colonies, even with marked reductions in the CFU-F activity of tFP635-PαS in secondary plating. Moreover, tFP635-PDSP formed colonies even in the third round of plating (Fig. 5A). These data suggest that tFP635-PDSP fraction contains more CFU-Fs with long-term replating capacity than tFP635-PαS fraction even though its frequency is low. We then examined the differentiation capacity of freshly sorted tFP635-PDSP and found that the cells accumulated lipid droplets less efficient than tFP635-PαS in adipogenic induction media (Fig. 5B, C). tFP635-PαS accumulated lipid droplets even in the maintenance media, which lacks adipogenic inducers but maintains adipocyte lineage cells, whereas tFP635-PDSP did not (Fig. 5B middle panels). In contrast, osteogenic differentiation was more efficient in tFP635-PDSP. Then, we dissociated the tFP635-PαS or tFP635-PDSP primary colonies with trypsin and assessed the differentiation capacity. The cells from tFP635-PDSP primary colonies differentiated into adipogenic cells as efficient as freshly sorted tFP635-PDSP, whereas tFP635-PαS greatly reduced the adipogenic capacity during culture in the colony assay condition (Fig. 5B, C). These data together indicated that cells with a colony-forming capacity in the tFP635-PDSP possess an adipogenic potential in addition to osteogenic potential.
We previously reported that the expression of FZD5 distinguished immature MSC clones with a high proliferative capacity and multilineage differentiation capacity from MSC clones with a limited replicative life span in vitro. This finding prompted us to investigate whether the expression of Fzd5 also marks immature MSC in vivo, and, thus, we generated the mouse strain, Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635, which expresses CreERT and tFP635 in Fzd5-expressing cells. In Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635, the Fzd5 promoter drove tFP635 to LepR+MSC and a small fraction of PαS. LepR+MSC showed adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation in vitro and in vivo and inducible lineage tracing using Ebf3-CreERT also revealed the lifelong self-renewal capacity of LepR+MSC in the adult stage [7, 8, 21]. Moreover, PαS retained tri-lineage differentiation and self-renewal capacities in vitro. Therefore, Fzd5 promoter-driven tFP635 marks two types of previously identified MSC fraction in animal. Recent studies reported that the proliferation and lineage choice of MSC were, at least partially, regulated by systemic and local external signals [22, 23]. Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635, which marks a part of PαS and LepR+MSC, is a valuable tool for assessing the effects of environmental cues on MSC dynamics. This is the first reporter strain that traces the turnover of PαS in a TM-inducible manner.
Lepr-tdTomato also marks some PαS in addition to LepR+MSC. tFP635+PDSP and Lepr-tdTomato+LepR+MSC appeared to largely overlap because the majority of tFP635+PDSP expressed Lepr; however, we were unable to experimentally confirm this due to technical limitations. In contrast, only 25% of tFP635+PαS expressed Lepr. In Fzd5-GFP, tFP635+PαS accounts for approximately 10% of PαS, and the frequency of GFP+ cells progressively increased to approximately 80% in PαS and maintained for a year after the TM injection. In striking contrast, the proportion of tdTomato+ cells was kept low in PαS during our observation period. Theoretically, at least, a part of GFP+PαS cells were tFP635+PαS cells or progenies of tFP635+PαS cells at early time-point since GFP labeled cells are CreERT-expressing cells at the time of TM injection or their descendants. Therefore, it seems that Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635 and Lepr-tdTomato marked distinct PαS subpopulations. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that some GFP+PαS cells were derived from tFP635+ cells outside of the PαS fraction in later time-point, e.g., tFP635-PDSP/ LepR+MSC or DN, since PαS was not the only cell expressing CreERT in the Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635. An approximately 20% of PαS cells were not labeled with GFP even after 1 year of chasing period in the TM-treated Fzd5-GFP, indicating that these PαS cells were quiescent and rarely replaced with GFP+PαS in steady-state or GFP-PαS cells were derived from non-PαS fraction which do not express the CreERT (discussed below). Development of the mouse strain, which express the Cre recombinase specifically in the PαS, will enable us to understand the hierarchical relationship between the PαS and other stromal fractions, e.g., LepR+MSC, tFP635-PDSP, or SSP.
We also exhibited that Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635 facilitates screening for non-hematopoietic subfractions in the BM and identified tFP635-PDSP as a putative novel MSC fraction. The colony-forming activity of tFP635-PDSP was approximately 25% of tFP635-PαS in primary plating, but was sustained or slightly increased in secondary plating and formed a significant amount of tertiary colonies, whereas the CFU-F activities of tFP635-PαS and tFP635+PαS markedly decreased in secondary plating. Freshly sorted tFP635-PDSP rarely differentiated into an adipogenic lineage, whereas tFP635-PαS robustly accumulated lipid droplets. In contrast, tFP635-PDSP uniformly differentiated into an osteolineage more efficiently than tFP635-PαS. Of note, cells consisting of CFU-F colonies derived from tFP635-PDSP clearly retained adipogenic and osteogenic potentials, showing that only cells with a colony-forming capacity in the tFP635-PDSP fraction possessed an adipogenic potential in addition to osteogenic potential. Therefore, a small portion of tFP635-PDSP is MSC, while the remainders are unipotential cells capable of generating osteolineage cells, thus lineage-biased MSC or osteoblast progenitor. On the other hand, tFP635-PαS seems to be a heterogenous population consisting of a small portion of MSC and APC. This result is consistent with previous report showing that APC and OPC are immunophenotypically defined as Cd45-Ter19-Cd31-Pdgfrα+Cd24- and Cd45-Ter19-Cd31-Pdgfrα+Sca1-, respectively . FCM and expression analyses revealed that tFP635-PDSP expressed neither LepR+MSC nor Nestin-GFP+MSC markers, demonstrating that tFP635-PDSP were previously unidentified MSC fraction. However, clonogenic in vivo long-term transplantation analyses are needed to confirm this result.
In the E13.5 hindlimb, more than 90% of non-hematopoietic cells are Pdgfrα+Sca1-. Some Pdgfrα+ cells start to express Sca1 as development proceeds, and obvious PαS fraction emerged at E18.5 . Moreover, lineage tracing with Pdgfrα-CreERT showed that cells exhibiting CFU-F activity in the CR fraction mostly originated from Pdgfrα+ cells . Collectively, these results imply that Pdgfrα+Sca1- is a precursor of PαS in fetal development. Similarly, it is worth to speculate that tFP635-PDSP is a bona fide MSC that give rise to PαS, and also other known MSC, in adults.
Here, we generated the transgenic mouse strain (Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635) that express the CreERT and tFP635 under the transcriptional control of Fzd5 gene using BAC transgenic technique and showed that the mouse strain marks two different types of MSCs, PαS, and LepR+MSC.
Availability of data and materials
The data that support the findings of this study and materials are available from the corresponding author, SM, upon reasonable request
Bacterial artificial chromosome
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell
Leptin receptor-expressing MSCs
Pdgfrα single-positive cell
Sca1 single-positive cell
Adipocte prohenitor cell
Osteoblast progenitor cell
Stem cell factor
C–X–C Motif Chemokine Ligand 12
Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284(5411):143–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5411.143.
Li H, Ghazanfari R, Zacharaki D, Lim HC, Scheding S. Isolation and characterization of primary bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2016;1370(1):109–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13102.
Mabuchi Y, Matsuzaki Y. Prospective isolation of resident adult human mesenchymal stem cell population from multiple organs. Int J Hematol. 2016;103(2):138–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-015-1921-y.
Sugiyama T, Kohara H, Noda M, Nagasawa T. Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches. Immunity. 2006;25(6):977–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.016.
Omatsu Y, Sugiyama T, Kohara H, Kondoh G, Fujii N, Kohno K, et al. The essential functions of adipo-osteogenic progenitors as the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell niche. Immunity. 2010;33(3):387–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2010.08.017.
Yue R, Zhou BO, Shimada IS, Zhao Z, Morrison SJ. Leptin receptor promotes adipogenesis and reduces osteogenesis by regulating mesenchymal stromal cells in adult bone marrow. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18(6):782–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.02.015.
Zhou BO, Yue R, Murphy MM, Peyer JG, Morrison SJ. Leptin-receptor-expressing mesenchymal stromal cells represent the main source of bone formed by adult bone marrow. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(2):154–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2014.06.008.
Zhou BO, Yu H, Yue R, Zhao Z, Rios JJ, Naveiras O, et al. Bone marrow adipocytes promote the regeneration of stem cells and haematopoiesis by secreting SCF. Nat Cell Biol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3570.
Ding L, Morrison SJ. Haematopoietic stem cells and early lymphoid progenitors occupy distinct bone marrow niches. Nature. 2013;495(7440):231–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11885.
Ding L, Saunders TL, Enikolopov G, Morrison SJ. Endothelial and perivascular cells maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2012;481(7382):457–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10783.
Pinho S, Lacombe J, Hanoun M, Mizoguchi T, Bruns I, Kunisaki Y, et al. PDGFRα and CD51 mark human Nestin+ sphere-forming mesenchymal stem cells capable of hematopoietic progenitor cell expansion. J Exp Med. 2013;210(7):1351–67. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20122252.
Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/14653240600855905.
Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V. Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(9):726–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2395.
Morikawa S, Mabuchi Y, Kubota Y, Nagai Y, Niibe K, Hiratsu E, et al. Prospective identification, isolation, and systemic transplantation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells in murine bone marrow. J Exp Med. 2009;206(11):2483–96. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20091046.
Harada S, Mabuchi Y, Kohyama J, Shimojo D, Suzuki S, Kawamura Y, et al. FZD5 regulates cellular senescence in human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. Stem Cells. 2021;39(3):318–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.3317.
Kawamoto S, Niwa H, Tashiro F, Sano S, Kondoh G, Takeda J, et al. A novel reporter mouse strain that expresses enhanced green fluorescent protein upon Cre-mediated recombination. FEBS Lett. 2000;470(3):263–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01338-7.
Kawamoto T. Use of a new adhesive film for the preparation of multi-purpose fresh-frozen sections from hard tissues, whole-animals, insects and plants. Arch Histol Cytol. 2003;66(2):123–43. https://doi.org/10.1679/aohc.66.123.
Crane G, Jeffery E, Morrison SJ. Adult haematopoietic stem cell niches. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2017.53.
Omatsu Y, Seike M, Sugiyama T, Kume T, Nagasawa T. Foxc1 is a critical regulator of haematopoietic stem/progenitor cell niche formation. Nature. 2014;508(7497):536–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13071.
Ambrosi TM, Scialdone A, Graja A, Gohlke S, Jank AM, Bocian C, et al. Adipocyte accumulation in the bone marrow during obesity and aging impairs stem cell-based hematopoietic and bone regeneration. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20(6):771–784.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.02.009.
Seike M, Omatsu Y, Watanabe H, Kondoh G, Nagasawa T. Stem cell niche-specific Ebf3 maintains the bone marrow cavity. Genes Dev. 2018;32(5-6):359–72. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.311068.117.
Thomas S, Jaganathan BG. Signaling network regulating osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Commun Signal. 2021;16(1):47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12079-021-00635-1.
Hawkes CP, Mostoufi-Moab S. Fat-bone interaction within the bone marrow milieu: Impact on hematopoiesis and systemic energy metabolism. Bone. 2019;119:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2018.03.012.
Nusspaumer G, Jaiswal S, Barbero A, Reinhardt R, Ronen DI, Haumer A, et al. Ontogenic identification and analysis of mesenchymal stromal cell populations during mouse limb and long bone development. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9(4):1124–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.08.007.
Miwa H, Era T. Tracing the destiny of mesenchymal stem cells from embryo to adult bone marrow and white adipose tissue via Pdgfrα expression. Development. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.155879 PMID: 29378823.
We would like to thank Hiromi Miyauchi and Mari Iizuka for their technical assistance. We are grateful to Dr. Yo Mabuchi (Tokyo Medical and Dental University) for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (#19K08865) from MEXT, Japan. This work is also partly supported by the Japanese Society of Hematology Research Grant.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All experiments using mice were performed under our institutional guidelines for the use of laboratory animals and approved by the Review Board for Animal Experiments of Shimane University (approval ID: IZ30-118 and IZ2-11).
Consent for publication
YK and YM are employee and CSO of PuREC Co., Ltd., respectively. KH and DH are employees of FUJIFILM Corporation. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Localization of tFP635+ cells in the femur from Fzd5-CreERT-tFP635I (related to Figure 1). The femur sections were stained with DAPI and observed under a fluorescent microscope. TB, trabecular bone; CB, cortical bone.
Anatomical localization of PαS and LepR+MSC (related to Figure 2). (A) Schematic representation of the anatomical fractionation experiment. (B) After fractionation of the long bones and enzymatic digestion, a single-cell suspension was stained for PαS (B) or LepR+MSC (C). (D, E) Frequency (D) and absolute number (E) of PαS, PDSP, SSP, and LepR+MSC in each fraction. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .005; ****P < .0005; ****P < .00005 by the Student’s t-test.
Gating strategy for analysis of Lepr and tFP635 expression in the PαS and PDSP (related to Figure 2). Expression of Lepr and tFP635 in the PαS or PDSP cells from indicated mouse was assessed by FCM.
Fzd5 expression in the various BM fractions (related to Figure 2). RT-qPCR analysis of Fzd5 in PαS, PDSP, SSP and Cd45+ cells. Hprt1 was used to normalize the amount of input RNA. All data are shown as the mean ± SEM.
About this article
Cite this article
Miyagi, S., Kato, Y., Watanabe, A. et al. Generation of a BAC transgenic mouse strain that expresses CreERT and a fluorescent protein under the transcriptional control of the Fzd5 locus. Inflamm Regener 42, 6 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41232-022-00194-x
- Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC)
- Leptin receptor-expressing MSC (LepR+MSC)